A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task

Abstract

It has long been argued that patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties in decision making and problem solving in real-world, ill-structured situations, particularly problem types involving planning and look-ahead components. Recently, several researchers have questioned our ability to capture and characterize these deficits adequately using just the standard neuropsychological test batteries, and have called for tests that reflect real-world task requirements more accurately. We present data from 10 patients with focal lesions to the prefrontal cortex and 10 normal control subjects engaged in a real-world financial planning task. We also introduce a theoretical framework and methodology developed in the cognitive science literature for quantifying and analysing the complex data generated by problem-solving tasks. Our findings indicate that patient performance is impoverished at a global level but not at the local level. Patients have difficulty in organizing and structuring their problem space. Once they begin problem solving, they have difficulty in allocating adequate effort to each problem-solving phase. Patients also have difficulty dealing with the fact that there are no right or wrong answers nor official termination points in real-world planning problems. They also find it problematic to generate their own feedback. They invariably terminate the session before the details are fleshed out and all the goals satisfied. Finally, patients do not take full advantage of the fact that constraints on real-world problems are negotiable. However, it is not necessary to postulate a 'planning' deficit. It is possible to understand the patients' difficulties in real world planning tasks in terms of the following four accepted deficits: inadequate access to 'structured event complexes', difficulty in generalizing from particulars, failure to shift between 'mental sets', and poor judgment regarding adequacy and completeness of a plan.

A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition

“…Although there exists a paucity of research related to the cognitive determinants of semantic planning, research concerning patients with frontal lobe damage has provided some initial data. Patients with frontal lobe damage exhibit difficulty in formulating both episodic plans (see above) and financial plans for others (78). It is important to point out that financial planning for others may incorporate both episodic and semantic features of planning (e.g., people may use their own experiences to formulate plans for others) (ref.…”

A Psychological and Neuroanatomical Model of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

“…Patients with PFC lesions (and thus disruption of their SECs) should show deficits in ordering events into a coherent sequence. Patients with PFC damage have particular difficulty sequencing events,79 can generate a normal number of actions, but have difficulty ordering those actions into a coherent script,80,81 and appear to lose infrequently used SECs before frequently used (and thus overlearned) SECs 80,82. Patients with dementias affecting the frontal lobes typically demonstrate deficits in social behaviors with relative preservation of episodic memory, while patients with dementia initially affecting the medial temporal lobes (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease) typically demonstrate initial deficits in episodic memory with relative preservation of social behavior 83…”

23 Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Human Comprehension

“…In contrast, patients with frontal lobe damage usually have little difficulties in execution of simple familiar routines, but are unable to engage in behaviors that are weakly established and require understanding of a goal and the means to achieve it (Shallice et al, 1991). Several studies suggested that access to graded semantic representations in these patients is relatively spared: they have no difficulty in determining which events tend to co-occur in common realworld activities (Sirigu et al, 1995(Sirigu et al, , 1996; and they are selectively impaired in sequentially ordering uncommon or unfamiliar rather than routine event sequences (Sirigu et al, 1995;Goel et al, 1997).…”