1994
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(94)90071-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the numerical heating in electrostatic particle simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the present stability analysis alone is not expected to account for the complex issue of numerical self-heating [1,56], the results of Table 2 are found in reasonable agreement with the lower bound of the above heuristic range, as they indicate a complete stabilization of the system for v t Dt=Dx J 0:1 in case of a linear weigth factor and h f ¼ 1.…”
Section: Dispersion Relation Of Electrostatic Plasma Wavessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Even though the present stability analysis alone is not expected to account for the complex issue of numerical self-heating [1,56], the results of Table 2 are found in reasonable agreement with the lower bound of the above heuristic range, as they indicate a complete stabilization of the system for v t Dt=Dx J 0:1 in case of a linear weigth factor and h f ¼ 1.…”
Section: Dispersion Relation Of Electrostatic Plasma Wavessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In a simulation of an open system, such as a discharge, one should ensure that this spurious heating rate is small compared to the physical heating rate. The dependence of the self-heating rate on the numerical parameters has been extensively discussed in earlier works [9,10,17]. The second kind of error is spurious relaxation of the distribution function toward a Maxwellian, an effect sometimes called "collisions," although to minimize confusion we will generally avoid this term in the present discussion.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Particle-in-cell Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This may not always pertain to observations. In addition, numerical noise causes unwanted numerical particle diffusion [21]. In contrast, Vlasov codes have very low noise levels and are not subject to mass scaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%