1981
DOI: 10.3109/00313028109086826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the major australian snake venoms in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis): I. the movement of injected venom, methods which retard this movement, and the response to antivenoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also free of any obvious immediate or delayed adverse reactions, in contrast to the reported 36% rate of immediate hypersensitivity reactions noted in a recent human RBBS series treated with equine F(ab) 2 antivenoms (Churchman et al, 2010). The rapid clinical responsiveness reported here is consistent with earlier studies conducted in experimentally envenomed monkeys, injected with RBBS venom, and subsequently treated with equine antivenom (Sutherland et al, 1981). However a RBBS envenomation case report of a dog that was euthanased due to anuric renal failure, despite receiving bivalent CSL tiger/brown snake antivenom 15 h after envenomation, demonstrates the potential of un-neutralised circulating venom to cause secondary complications and death (Heller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was also free of any obvious immediate or delayed adverse reactions, in contrast to the reported 36% rate of immediate hypersensitivity reactions noted in a recent human RBBS series treated with equine F(ab) 2 antivenoms (Churchman et al, 2010). The rapid clinical responsiveness reported here is consistent with earlier studies conducted in experimentally envenomed monkeys, injected with RBBS venom, and subsequently treated with equine antivenom (Sutherland et al, 1981). However a RBBS envenomation case report of a dog that was euthanased due to anuric renal failure, despite receiving bivalent CSL tiger/brown snake antivenom 15 h after envenomation, demonstrates the potential of un-neutralised circulating venom to cause secondary complications and death (Heller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…19,20 Although, tiger snake antivenom is recommended for systemic P. porphyriacus envenomation, it is not indicated for use in the case of P. australis or P. colletti envenomation. 21 The pharmacological basis for the apparent cross-reactivity of tiger snake antivenom against venoms from snakes of different genera is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while PBI is highly effective at limiting toxin entry into the circulation in animal studies and mock venom studies [11], [12], its application in the clinical setting may be more tenuous. Therefore, co-application of adjunct methods that impede venom transport through the lymphatics may be beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%