A Study of the Intersubjective Reviewer Agreement and Manuscript Improvement During the Evaluation Process of Journal Submissions

Hentschel, Uwe; Pokorný, Dan

doi:10.1080/01639260802194990

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Literature Review1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…16 Hentschel and Pokorny conducted a five-year study looking at submitted papers finding an "improvement from the first to last submission of a paper to the journal." 17 Authors have also noted that working with the review process has resulted in better papers. One study showed 90 percent of respondents agreeing with the statement that "peer review improves the quality of the published paper."…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Reviewers of Academic Journals: Who Is Responsible for Our Professional Literature

Francis

2013

CRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholarly journals provide a record of the research, issues, and concerns of a field. Authors have their names associated with their individual articles, while editors are connected with a publication. However, there is another group of individuals who are often left out of the record, although their contributions are just as critical in the formation of scholarly journals. This article will take a look at this group of peer reviewers, to provide demographic data as well as understanding for the reasons individuals take on the duty of peer reviewer.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Reviewers of Academic Journals: Who Is Responsible for Our Professional Literature

Francis

2013

CRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Study of the Intersubjective Reviewer Agreement and Manuscript Improvement During the Evaluation Process of Journal Submissions

Cited by 1 publication

References 9 publications

Peer Reviewers of Academic Journals: Who Is Responsible for Our Professional Literature

Peer Reviewers of Academic Journals: Who Is Responsible for Our Professional Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About