2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and price image on retailer personality and consumers' reactions (satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the retailer)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
108
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Lombart and Louis (2014) demonstrated the mediator role of trust in the connection between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in the grocery retail sector.…”
Section: Customer Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lombart and Louis (2014) demonstrated the mediator role of trust in the connection between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in the grocery retail sector.…”
Section: Customer Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust (TRUST) was measured by three items adapted from Gurviez and Korchia (2002); Swaen and Chumpitaz (2008); Lombart and Louis (2014). Loyalty (LOY) was measured by five items adapted from Zeithaml et al (1996).…”
Section: Instrument and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this specific profile, trust in the store has no impact on the three variables of the relational chain posited in this study: attachment, attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. Note that Lombart and Louis (2014) and Lombart et al (2016) could not establish also a link between consumer trust and loyalty to the retailer. Hypotheses H13a, H13b and H13c are therefore not supported by our data for this profile, as well as hypotheses H14 and H15 relating to The convergent validities (ρ vc ) are shown on the diagonal and the square of the correlations (R ij 2 ) appear below the diagonal.…”
Section: Impacts Of the Perceptions Of The Product: Role Of Perceivedmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Taneja et al (2011) categorized CSR research into five major types. Type one discussed the meaning, definition, and model of CSR (Carroll, 1979(Carroll, , 1999(Carroll, , 2010Dahlsrud, 2008;Van Marrewijk, 2003); type two identified factors determining CSR (Lange & Washburn, 2012;Wu, 2014); type three analyzed actions of CSR (Oberseder, Schlegelmilch, & Murphy, 2013;Babiak & Trendafilova, 2011;Bravo, Matute, & Pina, 2012); type four identified the effects of CSR on stakeholders and financial performance (Chih et al, 2014;Lombart & Louis, 2014;Lu, Chau, Wang, & Pan, 2014;Oberseder et al, 2013); type five explored the measurement tools of corporate social performance (Giannarakis, Litinas, & Theotokas, 2011;Turker, 2009;Wood, 2010;Wagner, Bicen, & Hall, 2008). Extensive research has been conducted on CSR; however, little research has addressed the concerns of CSR (i.e., CSiR), which is a major gap in consumer behavior research.…”
Section: Csr and Csirmentioning
confidence: 99%