2011
DOI: 10.1177/0021998311410508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the effect of experimental test parameters on data scatter in microbond testing

Abstract: This paper evaluates the effect of two experimental parameters, namely microvise blade geometry and blade separation, on the scatter in measured interfacial strength in microbond experiments, with the help of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) finite element models. The 3D model better captures the ‘exact’ loading nature of the problem as compared to the 2D model but it is computationally intensive. Stress distributions obtained by finite element analysis are compared with those from the shear-lag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average IFSS, Τ ave , is calculated as the experimental peak force divided by the contact surface area at the interface, assuming the stress distribution is uniform over the interface. 21,26 Alternatively, the ultimate IFSS, Τ ult , is the shear stress at the point where interfacial failure initiates. 27 The value of Τ ult can be determined from Raman spectroscopy 27 by evaluating local strains in specimens at the fibre/matrix interface, 15 but these experiments are difficult to perform compared to the microdroplet test.…”
Section: Fe Modelling For Microdroplet Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average IFSS, Τ ave , is calculated as the experimental peak force divided by the contact surface area at the interface, assuming the stress distribution is uniform over the interface. 21,26 Alternatively, the ultimate IFSS, Τ ult , is the shear stress at the point where interfacial failure initiates. 27 The value of Τ ult can be determined from Raman spectroscopy 27 by evaluating local strains in specimens at the fibre/matrix interface, 15 but these experiments are difficult to perform compared to the microdroplet test.…”
Section: Fe Modelling For Microdroplet Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the contact point of the blades on the droplet is expected to influence the stress distribution at the interface, affecting the failure mode and the IFSS. 20,21 The FE model is used to study the effect of the radial opening distance between the shear blades, and the axial misalignment of the blades, which can occur due to inaccurate experimental setup. 22,23 The meniscus that forms where the fibre exits the droplet is neglected in some FE models in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation associated with debonding is assumed to be elastic, although some authors have noted that plastic deformation can occur for thermoplastic systems [31], potentially invalidating results. The calculation for apparent IFSS also assumes that the stress along the interface is constant, which is a simplification, as the shear-lag approach [32,33] and FEA modelling [34,35] have both shown it varies along the embedded length. A constant interfacial stress also implies that failure is more sudden, with no account for the progressive ''unzipping'' due to interfacial crack propagation.…”
Section: Microbond Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix was sheared off by Zwick Z005 (Ulm, Germany) type universal tester using a special droplet removing device [17,18] at room temperature. Electron micrographs were made on EOL JSM-6380LA (Tokyo, Japan) type electron microscope, with gold coated specimens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…value was determined according to as the ratio of deboning force and embedded surface of fiber [15,17]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%