1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02294390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the classification capabilities of neural networks using unsupervised learning: A comparison withK-means clustering

Abstract: K-means, Kohonen, Monte Carlo simulation, neural networks, nonhierarchical clustering,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Murtagh (1995) noted that the interpretation of the resulting maps from the SOM method is often difficult without subsequent cluster analysis. Balakrishnan et al (1994) indicated that for solutions with a small number of groupings, the SOM seems to be less competitive than conventional clustering algorithms. More importantly, many studies have indicated that in general, the SOM is a stochastic process, with its output being sensitive to the algorithm implementation settings including the initialisation of reference vectors, order of data presentation, learning rates and neighbourhood width (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Murtagh (1995) noted that the interpretation of the resulting maps from the SOM method is often difficult without subsequent cluster analysis. Balakrishnan et al (1994) indicated that for solutions with a small number of groupings, the SOM seems to be less competitive than conventional clustering algorithms. More importantly, many studies have indicated that in general, the SOM is a stochastic process, with its output being sensitive to the algorithm implementation settings including the initialisation of reference vectors, order of data presentation, learning rates and neighbourhood width (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions seem to be ambivalent as different authors point to different conclusions, and no definitive results have emerged. Some authors (Flexer 1999;Balakrishnan, Cooper et al 1994;Waller, Kaiser et al 1998) suggest that SOM performs equal or worst than statistical approaches, while other authors conclude the opposite (Openshaw and Openshaw 1997;Openshaw, Blake et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another observation, made by Balakrishnan et al [40] is that Kohonen feature maps are similar to the statistical technique of k-means clustering, yet it has been our observation that many papers describing an SOFM do not compare the efficacy of it with another visualization technique applied to the same dataset.…”
Section: Self-organizing Feature Mapsmentioning
confidence: 96%