A Study of the Classification of Resilience Factors: Development of the Bidimensional Resilience Scale (BRS)

真理, 平野

doi:10.2132/personality.19.94

Cited by 67 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All the resilience scores were modestly correlated with the perceived fatigue or psychological distress, although theoretically innate and acquired resilience was expected to behave differently in relation to them 25) . One possible reason for this may be related to the measurement of the resilience.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…In addition to total scores for the K10 (range: 0−40) and K6 (range: 0−24), percentages of the respondents with a score of 15 or more for the K10 and those with a score of 13 or more for the K6 were used as indices for possible common mental disorders and severe psychopathology, respectively. Psychological resilience was assessed with a 5-point bidirectional resilience scale (BRS) developed in Japan 25) . Indeed, other more popular resilience scales such as the Adolescent Resilience Scale 26) and the Resilience Scale 27) were available; however, we had great interest in two major factors of the BRS relating to innate and acquired resilience.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Personality and Resilience Associated with Perceived Fatigue of Local Government Employees Responding to Disasters

Kitamura

Shindo

Tachibana

et al. 2013

Journal of Occupational Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sciences-Objectives: According to some newspapers, concerns are growing over the health of local government employees in the Great East Japan Earthquake disaster areas. Concerns were consistently present after the Hanshin-Awaji and Niigata-Chuetsu earthquakes but not studied analytically. Methods: Municipal employees responding to the disasters after an earthquake and floods answered a questionnaire about the degrees of workload, fatigue, psychological distress, resilience and personality traits. Results: Twothirds of the employees suffered fatigue and psychological distress, which were significantly correlated with workload but inversely correlated with emotional stability personality traits and psychological resilience. Conclusions: Together with substantial workload, individual differences in emotional stability and to lesser degree in resilience were found to have an impact on perceived fatigue. These individual factors should be considered as potential mediators of distresses among local government employees responding to disasters. (J Occup Health 2013; 55: 1-5)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality and Resilience Associated with Perceived Fatigue of Local Government Employees Responding to Disasters

Kitamura

Shindo

Tachibana

et al. 2013

Journal of Occupational Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Consistent with conventional research on the associations between resilience and subjective stress response, our results indicated that low-innate and acquired resilience differs depending on the length of time elapsed Resilience and sIgA level. It has been proposed that acquired resilience can be learned in everyday life 9) . Moreover, the American Psychological Association 32) reported that resilience is not a trait, but consists of behaviors and thoughts that can be learned and developed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The BRS, which was developed by Hirano 9) , is a 21-item scale composed of seven factors that reflect both innate (four factors) and acquired (three factors) resiliencies. Innate resilience factors include optimism, control, sociability, and vitality, while acquired resilience factors include attempting to solve a problem, self-understanding, and understanding others.…”

Section: Psychological Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, many conventional scales that measure resilience also include social support or social stability as external factors. *Correspondence: hisashi3214@gmail.com Recently, Hirano 9) developed a two-dimensional resilience assessment, the Bidimensional Resilience Scale (BRS), that measures both "innate resilience factors", which are strongly related to temperament, and "acquired resilience factors", which are formed over the course of one's lifetime. Hirano 9) reported that innate and acquired resilience factors are each composed of different factors, based on Cloninger's temperament and character model 10) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effects of resilience on subjective stress response and salivary secretory immunoglobulin A in university students

Mitsuishi

Endo

Ishiwata

et al. 2016

JPFSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examined the effects of resilience on life stress by measuring subjective and physiological responses. Subjects were 32 college students who reported no remarkable subjective burden at the start of the study (initial period: T1), but some level of stressful burden 3 months later (second period: T2). Resilience levels were evaluated using the Bidimensional Resilience Scale (BRS), which measures innate and acquired resilience. The subjective stress level was assessed with the Stress Response Scale-18 (SRS-18). Saliva was also collected to measure the salivary secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) level. BRS was performed at T1, and SRS and saliva collection were administered at both T1 and T2. The subjects were divided into high-and low-resilience groups according to their median scores at T1. Additionally, the high-resilience group was classified as either high-innate resilience (HIR) or high-acquired resilience (HAR), and the low-resilience group as low-innate resilience (LIR) or low-acquired resilience (LAR), respectively, to reveal information in more detail. The depression-anxiety score for the SRS-18 in the low-resilience group was significantly higher than that in the high-resilience group at T2. The sIgA level of the high-resilience group was significantly higher than that of low-resilience group at T2. There were significant negative correlations between innate resilience and depression-anxiety, and total SRS-18 score; and negative correlations among acquired resilience and depression-anxiety, helplessness, total SRS-18 score, and sIgA level, respectively. These results suggested that the stress response in low-innate and acquired resilience differs depending on the length of time elapsed with stress, because low-innate and acquired resilience causes higher susceptibility to "depression-anxiety" as a psychological stress response factor. On the other hand, higher acquired resilience improved immune function in the presence of subjective burden.

show abstract

Estimation of Stress Resilience from Eye-Gaze Data Collected by a Tablet Terminal When Performing a Dot-Probe Task: Application to Junior High School Students

Yokota,

Kotani,

Asao

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Study of the Classification of Resilience Factors: Development of the Bidimensional Resilience Scale (BRS)

Cited by 67 publications

References 14 publications

Personality and Resilience Associated with Perceived Fatigue of Local Government Employees Responding to Disasters

Personality and Resilience Associated with Perceived Fatigue of Local Government Employees Responding to Disasters

The effects of resilience on subjective stress response and salivary secretory immunoglobulin A in university students

Estimation of Stress Resilience from Eye-Gaze Data Collected by a Tablet Terminal When Performing a Dot-Probe Task: Application to Junior High School Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About