A study of the adsorption of bacterial cells on porous materials

Samonin, V. V.; Elikova, E. E.

doi:10.1007/s11021-005-0011-1

Cited by 70 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Biochar may serve as a source of reduced carbon compounds (either the biochar particle itself, or organic molecules adsorbed to the particle's matrix), and/or nutrients, and as a refuge (see mechanism 4) for any biochar colonizing soil bacteria, including MHB and PSBs (Pietikäinen et al 2000;Samonin and Elikova 2004). Increased populations of PSB and/or MHB might then indirectly benefit mycorrhizal fungi (Fig.…”

Section: Mechanism 1: Biochar Changes Soil Nutrient Availabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Supporting evidence for this hypothesis comes from Saito (1990), Gaur and Adholeya (2000) and Ezawa et al (2002) who all showed that AMF readily colonize porous materials and were capable of heavily colonizing biochar particles in the soil. Lastly, Pietikäinen et al (2000) and Samonin and Elikova (2004) showed that bacteria readily colonized biochar particles; these may include MHB and/or PSB.…”

Section: Mechanism 4: Biochar Serves As a Refuge For Colonizing Fungimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil – concepts and mechanisms

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiments suggest that biomass-derived black carbon (biochar) affects microbial populations and soil biogeochemistry. Both biochar and mycorrhizal associations, ubiquitous symbioses in terrestrial ecosystems, are potentially important in various ecosystem services provided by soils, contributing to sustainable plant production, ecosystem restoration, and soil carbon sequestration and hence mitigation of global climate change. As both biochar and mycorrhizal associations are subject to management, understanding and exploiting interactions between them could be advantageous. Here we focus on biochar effects on mycorrhizal associations. After reviewing the experimental evidence for such effects, we critically examine hypotheses pertaining to four mechanisms by which biochar could influence mycorrhizal abundance and/or functioning. These mechanisms are (in decreasing order of currently available evidence supporting them): (a) alteration of soil physico-chemical properties; (b) indirect effects on mycorrhizae through effects on other soil microbes; (c) plant-fungus signaling interference and detoxification of allelochemicals on biochar; and (d) provision of refugia from fungal grazers. We provide a roadmap for research aimed at testing these mechanistic hypotheses.

show abstract

Section: Mechanism 1: Biochar Changes Soil Nutrient Availabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mechanism 4: Biochar Serves As a Refuge For Colonizing Fungimentioning

confidence: 99%

Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil – concepts and mechanisms

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adsorption of bacteria on LECA is known to be one of the most simple and cost‐effective immobilization methods (Korzhenevich et al . ; Muller and Gabriel ; Samonin and Elikova ; Ławniczak et al . ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Isolation of phage-display library-derived scFv antibody specific toListeria monocytogenesby a novel immobilized method

Nguyen

Trinh

Vu³

et al. 2018

J Appl Microbiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AAC is a lightweight building material exhibiting porosity up to 80% pore volume where more than 40% of the pore diameter is between 5 and 100 lm [13]. With bacteria diameter around 1 to 2 lm, this makes AAC a suitable carrier material to immobilize MOB in the biofilter setup as it can accommodate a high number of bacteria per gram of material [14]. In this study, we tested a methane biofilter using AAC as the carrier material to remove methane from dairy cow effluent gas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%