1956
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1956.9920280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Temporal Changes in the Organization of Retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…List organization as measured by repetitions declined with delay but not as measured by ratio of repetition. The findings are interpreted in terms of loss of knowledge of the list membership of categorial items with time_ Aside from two reports by Brand (1956; Brand & Woods, 1958), there has been little work on the free recall of lists of words over substantial retention intervals. In Brand's studies, recalls were obtained at intervals of 1,2, and 3 weeks following presentation of a list of items from the categories of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…List organization as measured by repetitions declined with delay but not as measured by ratio of repetition. The findings are interpreted in terms of loss of knowledge of the list membership of categorial items with time_ Aside from two reports by Brand (1956; Brand & Woods, 1958), there has been little work on the free recall of lists of words over substantial retention intervals. In Brand's studies, recalls were obtained at intervals of 1,2, and 3 weeks following presentation of a list of items from the categories of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from two reports by Brand (1956;Brand & Woods, 1958), there has been little work on the free recall of lists of words over substantial retention intervals. In Brand's studies, recalls were obtained at intervals of 1,2, and 3 weeks following presentation of a list of items from the categories of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%