1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(94)00669-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of surface cross-hatch and misfit dislocation structure in grown by chemical beam epitaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data exhibits no "cross-hatch" patterns associated with the misfit dislocations which accompany strain relaxation. 30 This indicates that the layer thickness d b = 230 Å is below the critical value and that the barrier layers in this particular MQW structure are under the full tensile strain. Figure 6 displays the surface topography for a GaAs 0.74 P 0.26 epilayer 2000 Å thick grown on a GaAs layer 2000 Å thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data exhibits no "cross-hatch" patterns associated with the misfit dislocations which accompany strain relaxation. 30 This indicates that the layer thickness d b = 230 Å is below the critical value and that the barrier layers in this particular MQW structure are under the full tensile strain. Figure 6 displays the surface topography for a GaAs 0.74 P 0.26 epilayer 2000 Å thick grown on a GaAs layer 2000 Å thick.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements applied to GaAs 0.97 P 0.03 /GaAs 0.71 P 0.29 MQW structure with a top GaAs 0.71 P 0.29 barrier layer of thickness 230 Å exhibited no "cross-hatch" patterns associated with misfit dislocations. 30 This indicates that the GaAsP barrier layers are pseudomorphic, i.e., under full tensile lattice mismatch strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These dislocations have special directions, so people want to use them to fabricate ordered QDs [4,5]. For example, Fumito Hiwatashi [4] found InAs QDs mainly aligned along [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] on InGaAs layer and thought that was because QDs prefer nucleating in the strainrelaxed regions of the strained layers. But, the regions with dense QDs they got were relatively wide, so the result they got cannot be called perfect ordering growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the growth proceeds, an increasing amount of accumulated elastic energy makes the layer to become metastable and the relaxation process begins [1,2]. Relaxation of low-strained layers ( < 2 %) usually takes place through misfit dislocations, and it is well known that the surface of these layers develops an undesired crosshatched morphology once the mechanisms for plastic relaxation start [3][4][5]. Furthermore, some studies on the low-mismatched SiGe/Si [6,7] and In x Ga 1-x As/InP (x  0.53) [8] systems have shown that the surface can also roughen prior to the generation of misfit dislocations and the subsequent crosshatch development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%