2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of supramolecular host–guest interaction of dothiepin and doxepin drugs with cyclodextrin macrocycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1. Without BSA and adenine, the absorption maxima of DOT was seen at 300, 260, 218 nm, and for DOX was seen at 292, 245 s , and 210 nm, respectively (19,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1. Without BSA and adenine, the absorption maxima of DOT was seen at 300, 260, 218 nm, and for DOX was seen at 292, 245 s , and 210 nm, respectively (19,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is well known that adenine forms a number of tautomer compounds ( Fig. S2) that can be quickly inter-changed and are usually considered equivalent [20]. The normal Stokes shifted emission (F 1 ) is thought to originate from the excitation of the normal adenine molecule.…”
Section: Fluorescence Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiempirical PM3 calculations show that the equimolar β-CD–IPM and β-CD–DXP inclusion complexes are thermodynamically stable; the aromatic moiety is partly included in the CD cavity [ 21 ], Table S1 . Moreover, in solution, DXP forms 1:2 inclusion complexes with α- and β-CDs such that the two aromatic A- and B-rings are embedded in the CD cavities with binding constants of 14.7–16.5 × 10 3 and 16.2–19.6 × 10 3 M −1 , as deduced from UV-vis and fluorescence data, respectively [ 22 ]. By contrast, in the gas phase, PM3 calculations suggest the energetically favorable 1:1 α-CD–DXP inclusion complex with the side chain enclosed in the cavity and maintained in position by van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in solution, DXP forms 1:2 inclusion complexes with α- and β-CDs such that the two aromatic A- and B-rings are embedded in the CD cavities with binding constants of 14.7–16.5 × 10 3 and 16.2–19.6 × 10 3 M −1 , as deduced from UV-vis and fluorescence data, respectively [ 22 ]. By contrast, in the gas phase, PM3 calculations suggest the energetically favorable 1:1 α-CD–DXP inclusion complex with the side chain enclosed in the cavity and maintained in position by van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions [ 22 ]. The weak host–guest interactions are confirmed in solution for the 3:1 β-CD–DXP inclusion complex based on UV-vis and fluorescence data [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD drug delivery systems, allow for encapsulation of small drug molecules as well as large biomolecules (Challa, Ahuja, Ali, & Khar, ; Davis & Brewster, ; Del Valle, ; Rajewski & Stella, ; Stella & Rajewski, ). The antidepressants, dothiepin and doxepin formed 1:2 inclusion nanostructures with α‐and β‐CDs and assemble into sphere and agglomerated structures (Rajendiran, Sankaranarayanan, & Saravanan, ). More complicated systems, involving the ternary complex “Guest 2/(Guest 1/γ‐CD)” permitted to load two different drugs at the same time; the first guest is located in the CD cavity, and the second guest is incorporated into the intermolecular spaces between CD channels (N. Liu, Higashi, Ueda, & Moribe, ).…”
Section: Oligosaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%