2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2002)128:1(92)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Soil-Reinforcement Interface Friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seo et al (2012) suggested the ultimate skin friction of a soilnail in cohesive soil utilising the initial suggestion proposed by Wang and Richwien (2002), as shown in Equation 10.…”
Section: Geotechnical Engineering Volume 170 Issue Ge6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seo et al (2012) suggested the ultimate skin friction of a soilnail in cohesive soil utilising the initial suggestion proposed by Wang and Richwien (2002), as shown in Equation 10.…”
Section: Geotechnical Engineering Volume 170 Issue Ge6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Japan Geotechnical Society (JGS, 2000) empirically proposed the ultimate skin friction (τ f ) based on the standard penetration test (SPT)-N value. Wang and Richwien (2002) suggested a theoretical equation that considers soil dilation to obtain the ultimate skin friction. Seo et al (2012) modified this theoretical solution to make it suitable for use with cohesive soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reported works include the popular pullout test for soil nails, as conducted by McDonald & Ims [16], Su et al [17] and Pei et al [18]. In addition, Wang & Richwien [19] examined the soil-nail interface friction, while Yin et al [20] investigated the effect of grouting pressure on the pullout resistance of a manmade compacted decomposed granite fill. Also, Yin & Xu [21] reported on the expedience of installing soil nail for supporting a foundation pit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found out that the apparent coe cient of bond friction between nails and soil was a ected by the friction angle of the soil, the rate of soil dilation during shear, the sti ness of the soil, and diameter of the nail in relation to mean particle size of the soil [9]. Wang and Richwien [10] also studied the friction mobilized between the soil and nails by comparing results of pull-out tests and direct shear tests. They observed that the mobilized friction between soil and nails was mainly dependent on the elastic parameters of the soil and its dilatancy angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%