2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2002.6852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Saturn's Ring Phase Curves from HST Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• of phase angle (Poulet et al 2002a), our data show that only slight variations in the spectra are seen in response to differing solar phase angles for λ between 0.9 and 2.6 µm, except between 1.1 and 1.4 µm where the 0.6…”
Section: The Spectramentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• of phase angle (Poulet et al 2002a), our data show that only slight variations in the spectra are seen in response to differing solar phase angles for λ between 0.9 and 2.6 µm, except between 1.1 and 1.4 µm where the 0.6…”
Section: The Spectramentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Cuzzi et al (2002) and Poulet et al (2002a) show how the wavelength-dependent reflectivity in the UV-visible range can significantly vary with phase even over 0-6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. We ignore all angle dependences of reflectance, which can affect the spectrum to some degree (Cuzzi et al 2002, Poulet et al 2002a.…”
Section: A Composite Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light scattering at wavelength λ from a particulate surface of a material with real and imaginary parts of the refractive index n and k is described by two parameters: (1) the ray propagation between scattering points, characterized by the optical depth τ = 4πkl/λ, where the parameter l is the average length of light propagation in a particle between internal reflections (for transparent particles, l should be equal approximately to the average diameter of the particle), and (2) the coefficient P, which is the porosity of a regolith-covered surface. We take a value of P = 0.9, which should be typical for the regolith of Saturn's ring particles (Poulet et al 2002a); in any case, Shkuratov et al (1999) showed that the porosity does not significantly affect the albedo of bright particulate surfaces. Shkuratov et al (1999) considered two types of particulate mixtures.…”
Section: Choice Of the Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two causes to give rise to the opposition effect are usually considered: (1) shadow-hiding and (2) interference-enhancement, often called coherent-backscatter. Some general regolith properties-dependent characteristics of each mechanism are understood, and some papers are devoted to a discussion on the relative contribution of both mechanisms (Drossart 1993;Helfenstein et al 1997Helfenstein et al , 1998Hapke et al 1998;Nelson et al 2000;Belskaya & Shevchenko 2000;Shkuratov & Helfenstein 2001;Poulet et al 2002). One can check for the effect of coherent backscatter and/or shadow hiding by studying the influence of wavelength of incident light on the opposition brigthening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%