2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5b8d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Quasar Selection in the Supernova Fields of the Dark Energy Survey

Abstract: We present a study of quasar selection using the supernova fields of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We used a quasar catalog from an overlapping portion of the SDSS Stripe 82 region to quantify the completeness and efficiency of selection methods involving color, probabilistic modeling, variability, and combinations of color/ probabilistic modeling with variability. In all cases, we considered only objects that appear as point sources in the DES images. We examine color selection methods based on the Wide-fiel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They tested various combinations of color and variability parameters, finding that using a combination of optical colors and variability parameters improves quasar classification efficiency and completeness over the use of colors alone. More recently, Tie et al (2017) used data from the supernova fields of the Dark Energy Survey (DES; Abbott et al 2018) to select quasars by combining color and variability selection methods. All these previous studies have shown the potential of selecting AGN candidates through variability analyses, demonstrating that variability-based techniques can increase considerably the number of AGN candidates in the redshift range where the colors of stars are similar to those of AGN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tested various combinations of color and variability parameters, finding that using a combination of optical colors and variability parameters improves quasar classification efficiency and completeness over the use of colors alone. More recently, Tie et al (2017) used data from the supernova fields of the Dark Energy Survey (DES; Abbott et al 2018) to select quasars by combining color and variability selection methods. All these previous studies have shown the potential of selecting AGN candidates through variability analyses, demonstrating that variability-based techniques can increase considerably the number of AGN candidates in the redshift range where the colors of stars are similar to those of AGN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the science objectives of OzDES include obtaining supernova (SN) host-galaxy redshifts for cosmology (e.g., Bazin et al 2011;Campbell et al 2013), spectroscopically classifying active transients, monitoring a sample of active galactic nuclei (AGN) for reverberation mapping (RM -see e.g., Bentz et al 2009;King et al 2015) and potentially for cosmology (Watson et al 2011;King et al 2014), securing redshifts for a wide variety of galaxies to be used for photometric redshift training (e.g., Sánchez et al 2014;Bonnett et al 2016), including a large sample of luminous red galaxies (LRGs; Banerji et al 2015), and using redshifts of selected galaxies to confirm their membership in clusters (e.g., Rozo et al 2016;Rykoff et al 2016). OzDES has already produced several discoveries, including spectroscopy of hundreds of active transients, many new QSOs (Tie et al 2017), and the first FeLoBAL QSO in a post-starburst galaxy (Mudd et al 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project photometrically and spectroscopically monitors 771 quasars in order to measure the masses of their SMBHs (King et al 2015). These quasars are as faint as 23.6 in g and were selected heterogeneously with a broad range of quasar detection techniques (e.g., Banerji et al 2015;Tie et al 2017). From the combination of these two surveys, we use the first three years of photometry and spectra for the 771 quasars that we continue to monitor (Diehl et al 2016;Childress et al 2017).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%