2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of prevalence and determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…History of congenital anomalies have 4.3 times odds more likely to develop GDM compare those without history of congenital anomalies. This finding is consistent with previous study [28, 93]. Similarly, to those with history of macrosomia and PIH have 4 times and 3 times for odds to have higher insulin resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…History of congenital anomalies have 4.3 times odds more likely to develop GDM compare those without history of congenital anomalies. This finding is consistent with previous study [28, 93]. Similarly, to those with history of macrosomia and PIH have 4 times and 3 times for odds to have higher insulin resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…26 A study by Thathagari et al from Karnataka reported that 59.5% were Multigravidae and 40.5% were Primigravidae. 27 Another study from Saudi Arabia reported 9.9% participants were Primigravidae while 90.1% were Multigravida. 28 In our study 31.7% participants were primigravidae and 68.3% were Multigravida.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8 In the present study the incidence of GDM was found to be 5.49% which was comparable to other studies conducted in India by Varija Thathagari et al in Mysore (5.5%), Maxima Anand et al in Punjab (5.3%) and Kalpana Varma in Uttar Pradesh (6.72%). 3,9,10 However, studies done by Shridevi AS et al in Davangere (11.5%), Karnataka and Pallav Parikh et al in Gujarat (13.79%) showed higher incidence of GDM. 4,11 This shows that there are wide variations in the incidence of GDM as reported in different parts of India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Studies have shown that there has been a rising trend of GDM in India, the prevalence ranging from 5.5% during 2005-2006 to 11.5% during 2013-2014. 3,4 This is probably associated with advancing maternal age, increased prevalence of maternal obesity, sedentary lifestyle and physical inactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%