2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2020.3005148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Personal Recognition Method Based on EMG Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, most of the related studies conducted biometrics experiments using one gesture, and no study used more than six gestures. In addition, we showed 99.17% performance on twenty subjects, which was more subjects than in related works (except [12,16]). Figure 7 shows the 9th, 10th, and 11th gestures as performed by the 11th and 14th subjects, which showed the highest misclassification rates in a single biometrics test.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By comparison, most of the related studies conducted biometrics experiments using one gesture, and no study used more than six gestures. In addition, we showed 99.17% performance on twenty subjects, which was more subjects than in related works (except [12,16]). Figure 7 shows the 9th, 10th, and 11th gestures as performed by the 11th and 14th subjects, which showed the highest misclassification rates in a single biometrics test.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Most existing works using EMG signals have been conducted on gesture recognition and biometrics from hand muscles measured while performing hand gestures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These works include studies using EMG signals of the lower body when a subject is walking [14] and those using EMG signals of the mouth muscles when talking [15,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification and recognition of study participants in a clinical trial-during the process of recruitment and during follow-up visits-is a growing issue [1]. Conventional methods for the recognition of participants in health facilities may include patient name, date of birth, government identity card with photo, and phone number [2][3][4][5]. However, these methods are not always reliable or accurate [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the device used in this study was a stand-alone type system and was not wearable, there were temporal and spatial limitations when using it for authentication [15]. Moreover, in another study, an individual used an EMG signal measurement module composed of eight channels, which performed personal authentication through convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis [16,17]. However, in these studies, the size of the device used was large [9], the measurement area was in the thigh, which was very inconvenient, and an additional stand-alone type of equipment was required for bio-signal measurement and processing [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%