2018
DOI: 10.22372/ijkh.2018.23.2.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of News Frames on the Controversy over Evolutionary Theories in South Korean Science Textbooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet there is no evidence that this argument has persuaded the majority of Koreans, who, unlike Americans, seldom witnessed creationists’ struggle to revise educational curricula. In Korea, there were only two public debates about the education of evolution, neither of which resulted in implementing creationists’ desire of revising school curricula (Jeong, 2018; Park, 2012a; Yi, 2001). In this context, I think, the majority of the respondents in the survey have chosen the option of teaching both evolution and creationism, according to the country’s political discourses of pluralism and antiauthoritarianism rather than the KACR’s claim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet there is no evidence that this argument has persuaded the majority of Koreans, who, unlike Americans, seldom witnessed creationists’ struggle to revise educational curricula. In Korea, there were only two public debates about the education of evolution, neither of which resulted in implementing creationists’ desire of revising school curricula (Jeong, 2018; Park, 2012a; Yi, 2001). In this context, I think, the majority of the respondents in the survey have chosen the option of teaching both evolution and creationism, according to the country’s political discourses of pluralism and antiauthoritarianism rather than the KACR’s claim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By promoting a “balanced treatment” of both evolutionary theory and creationism as equivalent scientific ideas, American antievolutionists strive to mask the religious nature of their beliefs and smuggle them into science curricula. In Korea, similar public debates took place twice in 1989 and 2012 (Jeong, 2018; Park, 2012a; Yi, 2001). In this context, the 2009 poll’s result was surprising, as it showed that more than 60% of respondents supported a “balanced treatment.” Yet why did so many Koreans endorse the inclusion of both evolution and creationism in science education, when creationists constituted slightly above 30% of the population?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%