2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of mutual information based feature selection for case based reasoning in software cost estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of effort estimation, it has been reported that reduced datasets improve the estimation accuracy [29,9,34,8]. It is known, however, that feature selection algorithms do not perform well with imbalanced datasets, resulting in a selection of metrics that cannot be adequate for the learning algorithms, decreasing the quality and usefulness of the rules.…”
Section: Reduction Of Imbalanced Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of effort estimation, it has been reported that reduced datasets improve the estimation accuracy [29,9,34,8]. It is known, however, that feature selection algorithms do not perform well with imbalanced datasets, resulting in a selection of metrics that cannot be adequate for the learning algorithms, decreasing the quality and usefulness of the rules.…”
Section: Reduction Of Imbalanced Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI and data mining techniques help in this filed [93,94]. The selection, mining and extraction of relevant features for case representation and weights for these features are open problems [95,96]. The problem becoming complicated in the recent medical CBR systems due to a complex data format where the data are coming from sensors, images, time series or free-text format.…”
Section: ) Case Solution Adaptation Has Many Techniques Range From Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…missing values problem). Feature set selection is another major research subject in cost estimation where some papers tried to evaluate the minimum set of attributes that can best predict the effort estimation [6,7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%