1951
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.1603.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study Of Minor Organic Deviations In ‘Functional’ Disorders Of Articulation: 4. The Teeth And Hard Palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that there was no clear evidence directly relating malocclusions to speech discrepancies. In addition, some researchers have reported that, during speech, subjects with a Class II malocclusion show a compensatory capability effected by readjusting the position of the tongue and mandible for the correct production of lingual-palatal sounds (Fairbanks and Lintner, 1951). However acoustic characteristics of /s/ and /s/ fricatives in Class III patients showed a distinct difference compared with a control group (Wakumoto, Isaacson, Friel, Suzuki, Gibbon, Nixon, Hardcastle, and Michi, 1996;Lee, Whitehill, Ciocca, and Samman, 2002 , [y]) following surgical RME in patients whose speech was considered perceptually normal before and after expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that there was no clear evidence directly relating malocclusions to speech discrepancies. In addition, some researchers have reported that, during speech, subjects with a Class II malocclusion show a compensatory capability effected by readjusting the position of the tongue and mandible for the correct production of lingual-palatal sounds (Fairbanks and Lintner, 1951). However acoustic characteristics of /s/ and /s/ fricatives in Class III patients showed a distinct difference compared with a control group (Wakumoto, Isaacson, Friel, Suzuki, Gibbon, Nixon, Hardcastle, and Michi, 1996;Lee, Whitehill, Ciocca, and Samman, 2002 , [y]) following surgical RME in patients whose speech was considered perceptually normal before and after expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient was treated with a Hyrax (OSI, Wilmington, Delaware) expansion appliance in the traditional technique (Fairbanks and Lintner, 1951) ( Figure 1). The expansion appliance was activated one-quarter turn in the morning and another one-quarter turn in the evening immediately after surgery, each day for 2-3 weeks until the necessary amount of expansion was achieved.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Niemi et al, compensatory movements of the tongue and mandible enabling normal incisor relations could occur in patients with class II malocclusion, and no significant changes in pronunciation were observed after mandibular advancement. However, this outcome may not be relevant to patients with class III malocclusion, and only a few studies of the structural changes in pronunciation and articulation after a mandibular setback have been conducted, there is no consensus on the effects of mandibular setback on the speech and voice (Fairbanks and Lintner, 1951;Hassan et al, 2007;Mishima et al, 2013). According to the author's previous study, patients with Angle's class III malocclusion showed a larger aperture for low vowels and a forwarding of the back vowels compared with occlusion patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We selected the adult volunteers who had a skeletal ClassI jaw relationship as normal subjects for this study, because it was reported that speech obstruction was not often seen in patients with Class I malocclusions . For the articulatory samples, /t/, /s/ and /k/ were chosen because a patient with mandibular prognathism was reported to have difficulty pronouncing these consonants .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%