1965
DOI: 10.21236/ad0660050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Low-Noise Broadband VLF Receiving Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all subjects, the hippocampi were manually outlined using the freeware software program MRIcron (Rorden, 2007) by two observers who were blinded to all subject information. The delineation protocol, the hippocampal boundaries, and the correction for brain volume are described in detail elsewhere (Jeukens et al, 2009).…”
Section: Volumetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all subjects, the hippocampi were manually outlined using the freeware software program MRIcron (Rorden, 2007) by two observers who were blinded to all subject information. The delineation protocol, the hippocampal boundaries, and the correction for brain volume are described in detail elsewhere (Jeukens et al, 2009).…”
Section: Volumetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, active matching networks for antennas with transistors or parametric amplifiers have been attempted by many since 1960s [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. The noise performance of directly connecting electrically small antennas to an amplifier, whether it is a Bipolar transistor (BJT), Field effect transistor (FET) or a parametric amplifier have been analyzed since 1965 [21]. Unfortunately, neither those experiments or analyses led to insights on how such receivers should be designed toward the best noise and bandwidth performance that are comparable or even superior to the traditional impedance matched designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some existing theoretical treatments of noise contribution of amplifiers in the antenna system are based on a constant LNA noise figure assumption which implies a constant amount of noise power is added in the receiver front-end [25], [27], [29] while in reality the amount of the noise added by the front-end is significantly impacted by the antenna's own impedance. Other classical treatments of transistor noises use an optimum noise impedance formulation derived from equivalent voltage and current noise sources observed through measurements [21]. However, the formulation has neither linked to the known scalable physical parameters of transistors such as gate periphery and transition frequencies, nor considered the practical constraints of the ESA impedance such as those imposed by Harrington-Chu's limit or Gustafsson's limit [11], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%