1973
DOI: 10.1093/jee/66.2.437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Insect Repellents. 2. Effect of Temperature on Protection Time1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors that influence the response of insects to repellent compounds have been variously reported (Khan et al, 1975;Kashin & Kardatzke, 1975;Garson & Winneke, 1968). Some insecticides act also as repellents and we have found no reports of a relationship between the resistance to insecticides and observations of repellency.…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Factors that influence the response of insects to repellent compounds have been variously reported (Khan et al, 1975;Kashin & Kardatzke, 1975;Garson & Winneke, 1968). Some insecticides act also as repellents and we have found no reports of a relationship between the resistance to insecticides and observations of repellency.…”
contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Ideally, the longevity of C. citratus repellents could be improved by combination with low concentrations of PMD that has known efÞcacy and longevity (Trigg 1996, Moore et al 2002 or in combination with a simple slow-release formulation, to reduce its volatility, e.g., mineral oil or vanillin (Tawatsin et al 2001). This is especially important as under realistic user conditions, such as working in the forest, duration of protection will be lower than under test conditions due to increased sweating and abrasion when people are active (Wood 1968, Khan et al 1972, Gabel et al 1976, Rueda et al 1998). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. citratus (Stapf), Guatemalan lemongrass, essential oil at 25% was used as a skin repellent, and it provided 74% protection for 2.5 h against predominantly A. darlingi and 95% protection for 2.5 h against Mansonia spp. Both these studies were conducted under field conditions and therefore, this is especially important as under realistic user conditions, such as working in the forest, duration of protection will be lower than under test conditions due to increased sweating and abrasion when people are active (Wood 1968;Khans et al 1972;Gabel et al 1976;Rueda et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%