2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-012-1385-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of impact of the geographic dependence of observing system on parameter estimation with an intermediate coupled model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al (2012) further introduced a geographic dependent parameter optimization (GPO) scheme to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the background error covariance in parameter estimation, and examined the impact of this new scheme on climate estimation and prediction using an intermediate coupled model within a perfect model framework (Wu et al, 2013). Recently, Zhang et al (2013b) investigated the impact of parameter estimation on climate estimation and prediction in an intermediate coupled model with biased physics within a biased twin experiment framework, which indicates that the adverse impact of biased physical schemes in a coupled model on climate estimation and prediction can be compensated partly by optimizing the most sensitive parameters employed in the physical schemes.…”
Section: G-j Han Et Al: Mitigation Of Model Biases Through Parametmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al (2012) further introduced a geographic dependent parameter optimization (GPO) scheme to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the background error covariance in parameter estimation, and examined the impact of this new scheme on climate estimation and prediction using an intermediate coupled model within a perfect model framework (Wu et al, 2013). Recently, Zhang et al (2013b) investigated the impact of parameter estimation on climate estimation and prediction in an intermediate coupled model with biased physics within a biased twin experiment framework, which indicates that the adverse impact of biased physical schemes in a coupled model on climate estimation and prediction can be compensated partly by optimizing the most sensitive parameters employed in the physical schemes.…”
Section: G-j Han Et Al: Mitigation Of Model Biases Through Parametmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter optimization, which includes the model parameters into control 20 variables, is a promising way to partly compensate for the bias of the values of the model parameters and improve the climate predictability(e.g. Zhang, 2011a,b;Zhang et al, 2012Zhang et al, ,2013bWu et al, 2012Wu et al, ,2013Liu et al 2014a,b;Han et al, 2014;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the larger the characteristic variability time scale is, the larger the corresponding OTW is. The model parameters are lack of direct observations and prognostic equations, parameter optimization completely relies on the covariance between a parameter and the 15 model state (e.g., Zhang, 2011a,b;Zhang et al, 2012;Wu et al 2012Wu et al ,2013Han et al, 2014;Liu et al 2014a,b). Thus the observational time window (OTW) of the model state in each media of the coupled climate system will do some impact on the quality of parameter optimization and climate prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, one traditionally determines the values of model parameters by experience or a trial procedure which heuristically provides a reasonable estimate but usually is not optimal for the coupled model. Recently, with the aid of information estimation (filtering) theory (e.g., Jazwinski, 1970), research on optimization of coupled model parameters based on instantaneous observational information has grown quickly (e.g., Wu et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2014a, b;Li et al, 2016). Traditional data assimilation that only uses observations to estimate model states (i.e., state estimation) becomes both state estimation (SE) and parameter estimation (also called optimization) (PE) with observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%