SAE Technical Paper Series 1982
DOI: 10.4271/820410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Gas Exchange Process Simulation of an Automotive Multi-Cylinder Internal Combustion Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the method of characteristics presents two major drawbacks-first-order accuracy ͑O(⌬x, ⌬t)), which derives from linear interpolation between grid points in the space domain, and the smearing of shocks in discontinuous solutions. In the last decade there have been some convincing examples of application of finite difference shockcapturing schemes, such as the FRAM 20 and the Lax-Wendroff methods, [21][22][23] to the calculation of unsteady flows in engine ducts, replacing the traditional mesh method of characteristics with more accurate and robust techniques. Following this strategy, efficient and robust finite-difference shock capturing schemes have been recently included in the simulation model, for the solution of the hyperbolic problem in conservation form.…”
Section: A Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method of characteristics presents two major drawbacks-first-order accuracy ͑O(⌬x, ⌬t)), which derives from linear interpolation between grid points in the space domain, and the smearing of shocks in discontinuous solutions. In the last decade there have been some convincing examples of application of finite difference shockcapturing schemes, such as the FRAM 20 and the Lax-Wendroff methods, [21][22][23] to the calculation of unsteady flows in engine ducts, replacing the traditional mesh method of characteristics with more accurate and robust techniques. Following this strategy, efficient and robust finite-difference shock capturing schemes have been recently included in the simulation model, for the solution of the hyperbolic problem in conservation form.…”
Section: A Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar technique but with a generalized form of the momentum equation was presented by MacLaren et al (10) while Daneshyar and Pearson (11) have developed the method to analyse flow in four-pipe junctions although in this case some simplification was made to reduce the computing time required by the model. Takizawa et a1 (12) have included a modified constant pressure model for manifold junctions in their engine simulation computer program. In this model pressure losses are calculated using a loss coefficient but the method for determining the appropriate value of this coefficient is not given.…”
Section: The M S Was Received On 28 December 1983 and Was Acceptedformentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the pressure variations along the exhaust manifolds are neglected. But for high-speed engines or pulse turbocharged engines, this approximation is not acceptable because of the pressure wave reflection time [12,23,24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%