2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Epidemiologic and Recurrence Factors of Oral Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the remainder of our results are comparable to past research findings. For example, smoking has been consistently shown to be disproportionately higher in rural populations . We confirmed this observation in our study cohort, where we found that patients living in a RA were more likely to have a smoking history than patients residing in non‐RA areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otherwise, the remainder of our results are comparable to past research findings. For example, smoking has been consistently shown to be disproportionately higher in rural populations . We confirmed this observation in our study cohort, where we found that patients living in a RA were more likely to have a smoking history than patients residing in non‐RA areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Using data from the British Columbia Cancer Agency and its provincial cancer registry, we evaluated the impact of urban and rural place of residence on outcomes of non‐nasopharyngeal HNC in a real‐world setting. This study represents one of the largest retrospective population‐based cohort analysis of HNC patients treated in British Columbia, Canada over a 10‐year timeframe, and improves on previously published work from other groups that have largely focused on a single HNC etiology across only a few specific institutions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prognosis is poor for most untreated patients with head and neck cancer (36) and these patients are likely to have a high chance of recurrence or distant metastases. There is limited evidence that smoking may increase risk of recurrence or distant metastases (37)(38)(39), and this could explain our findings. However, large, robust, population-based studies are required to better clarify the magnitude of the relationships between smoking and recurrence and distant metastases and how this evolves over time from diagnosis, before firmer conclusions can be reached Patients with head and neck cancer have a 36% cumulative risk of being diagnosed with a second primary cancer over 20 years, and the most common sites are the head and neck and lung (40).…”
Section: Smoking Recurrence and Second Primariesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Recurrence can be local, regional, locoregional or second primaries. Recurrence rates vary between 25-40% after a follow-up period of 2-4 years (Hakeem et al, 2012;Priya et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012). Most recurrences are local (Hakeem et al, 2012;Priya et al, 2012).…”
Section: Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable proportion of cases (34%) in Japan presented with second primaries (Shiga et al, 2011). The clinicopathological factors that influence the treatment outcome and likelihood of recurrence are use of tobacco, advanced T stage or stage III-IV disease at diagnosis, including local regional nodal involvement, positive resection margins or the resection margins being very close to the tumour and thickness of tumour ≥7mm (Battoo et al, 2012;Hakeem et al, 2012;Priya et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012). Patients who are pathologically negative for local regional nodal involvement could present with regional metastasis later due to occult metastasis (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%