2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of effects of tooth surface wear on time-varying mesh stiffness of external spur gear considering wear evolution process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ding et al 12 combined the nonlinear dynamic model with the wear model considering tooth backlash and time varying meshing stiffness, put forward the dynamic wear prediction method of gear, and clarified the two-way coupling relationship between tooth surface wear and dynamic response. Considering the influence of wear process on gear meshing stiffness, Chen et al 13 proposed a modified meshing stiffness model and found that gear wear can significantly reduce meshing stiffness. Liu et al 14 proposed a gear dynamic wear prediction method by combining nonlinear dynamic model with quasi-static wear model, and studied the coupling effect between surface wear and dynamic behavior in spur gear system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al 12 combined the nonlinear dynamic model with the wear model considering tooth backlash and time varying meshing stiffness, put forward the dynamic wear prediction method of gear, and clarified the two-way coupling relationship between tooth surface wear and dynamic response. Considering the influence of wear process on gear meshing stiffness, Chen et al 13 proposed a modified meshing stiffness model and found that gear wear can significantly reduce meshing stiffness. Liu et al 14 proposed a gear dynamic wear prediction method by combining nonlinear dynamic model with quasi-static wear model, and studied the coupling effect between surface wear and dynamic behavior in spur gear system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, gear failure includes wearing, fracture, pitting, spalling, etc. An evaluation of influences of tooth surface wear (TSW) on stiffness of the gear mesh considering wear evolution process was presented in [1]. A vibration-based scheme for updating a wear prediction model is proposed in [2] and a dynamic model of a spur gear system is firstly developed to generate realistic vibrations, which allows a quantitative study of the effects of gear tooth surface wear on gearbox vibration responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plenty of wear methodologies and theories are introduced into TFW study, in which the most popular is Archard wear theory. Chen W [8]and Zhang J [9] proposed a modified analytical time-varying mesh stiffness (TVMS) model considering the worn tooth profile and Feng K [10] represented the deviation of the profile from an ideal involute curve and obtained the wear coefficient by comparing experimental and simulation data. Wu S [11] applied the cantilever beam theory to study gear's time varying meshing stiffness by consideration of bending, shearing, compressing and contacting deformation and Feng S [12] developed it by introducing the Timoshenko beam theory which additionally takes fillet-foundation deformation into account, but the results of the theories mentioned are similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the fixed volume of the surface material will be exposed to repeated action of alternating stress, resulting in fatigue cracks in the microscopic volume, and finally cracks evolve into wear debris and fall off. The wear capacity Q is proportional to the normal load, inversely proportional to the hardness of the material, and proportional to the sliding distance according to Archard wear theory [8,20]. Although wear will lead to increased flank clearance, it is distinct from excessive flank clearance fault where a constant normal clearance value exists along the whole meshing surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%