2018
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of effects of anemia on maternal and perinatal outcomes

Abstract: Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of anemia in antenatal women and to assess the effects of anemia on maternal and perinatal outcomes.Methods: A cross sectional observational study was conducted on 1000 random patients admitted in the labour room.Results: Anemia was found in 687 patients (68.7%) at the time of delivery. Nearly 321 (46.72%) had mild, 349 (50.80%) had moderate and 17 (2.47%) had severe anemia. About 72% subjects were from 20-30 years age group, 77.7% belonged … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"In addition, most of the empirical research on board diversity was mainly carried out in developed countries, such as the U.S. [19], the U.K. [20] and Australia" [21]. "Owing to the differences between the developed and the developing countries, in terms of their regulatory, cultural and economic environments, size of capital markets and effectiveness of governance mechanism [22][23][24][25], more evidence should be drawn from the developing countries, in a way to contribute to the limited literature on board diversity in these countries, particularly in developing countries" [26]. "Rather than relying on research results from other countries, researchers need to take national circumstances into account in examining board diversity, thus calling for more research works on this topic to be undertaken in different countries" [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"In addition, most of the empirical research on board diversity was mainly carried out in developed countries, such as the U.S. [19], the U.K. [20] and Australia" [21]. "Owing to the differences between the developed and the developing countries, in terms of their regulatory, cultural and economic environments, size of capital markets and effectiveness of governance mechanism [22][23][24][25], more evidence should be drawn from the developing countries, in a way to contribute to the limited literature on board diversity in these countries, particularly in developing countries" [26]. "Rather than relying on research results from other countries, researchers need to take national circumstances into account in examining board diversity, thus calling for more research works on this topic to be undertaken in different countries" [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%