2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:tril.0000015202.29861.8d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Contact Temperature Due to Frictional Heating of UHMWPE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that under the same contact pair, higher contact stress may lead to higher frictional heat flux and increase in temperature. This phenomenon is consistent with the studies of Imado et al (2004). In their friction experiments, the increase in temperature corresponding to the contact stress of 12.6 MPa is 9°C, and the increase in temperature corresponding to the contact stress of 8.3 MPa is only 3°C.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Temperature Fieldsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that under the same contact pair, higher contact stress may lead to higher frictional heat flux and increase in temperature. This phenomenon is consistent with the studies of Imado et al (2004). In their friction experiments, the increase in temperature corresponding to the contact stress of 12.6 MPa is 9°C, and the increase in temperature corresponding to the contact stress of 8.3 MPa is only 3°C.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Temperature Fieldsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is well demonstrated that the heat distribution coefficient of the hard material acetabular cup is greater than that of UHMWPE. The calculated heat distribution coefficient of UHMWPE was well verified in the study of Imado et al (2004). Most of the heat in the MOP and COP contact pairs is dissipated in the femoral head, and only a small part of the heat is flowing into the inside of the acetabular cup.…”
Section: Analysis Of Frictional Heat Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The bulk lubricant temperature was higher in the all-polymer knee than in the conventional implant; this elevated temperature could be attributed to frictional heating 37 due to the anticipated higher friction in this material combination 8 and poor dissipation of heat due to the low thermal conductivity of the polymers. 38 Although higher friction bearing couples have exhibited frictional heating in vivo, 39 the clinical relevance of the elevated temperatures measured in our tests is unknown. The continuous running of the simulator may have accentuated the frictional heating 40 and led to a test artefact 41 by creating differing environmental test conditions for the different materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The maximum pressure according the hertzian equation is 14.5 MPa along with a contact width of 1.35 mm at peak load. A modulus of 200.000 MPa for CoCrMo and 600 MPa for UHMWPE and a Poisson ratio of 0.46 and 0.3 for the CoCrMo and the polyethylene, respectively, were used for the calculation [31,32].…”
Section: Self-made Tribological Testing Devicementioning
confidence: 99%