2017
DOI: 10.4103/gjtm.gjtm_8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of centralized individual donor nucleic acid testing for transfusion transmitted infections to improve blood safety in Karnataka, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the plasma contract fractionation project from 2006 to 2015, after screening 5.7 million seronegative donations for HCV RNA, HIV RNA, and HBV DNA, a total of 15 (0.26/10 5 donations) HBV DNA positive, eight (0.14/10 5 donations) HCV RNA positive, and no HIV RNA positive samples were reported. The frequency of detection in the NAT analysis was lower than the rate of serologic testing for all of the three viruses, similar to other studies 27–29 . Various countries in the region studied the prevalence of HBV DNA, HCV RNA, and HIV RNA in seronegative blood donations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…During the plasma contract fractionation project from 2006 to 2015, after screening 5.7 million seronegative donations for HCV RNA, HIV RNA, and HBV DNA, a total of 15 (0.26/10 5 donations) HBV DNA positive, eight (0.14/10 5 donations) HCV RNA positive, and no HIV RNA positive samples were reported. The frequency of detection in the NAT analysis was lower than the rate of serologic testing for all of the three viruses, similar to other studies 27–29 . Various countries in the region studied the prevalence of HBV DNA, HCV RNA, and HIV RNA in seronegative blood donations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The yield in our study was comparable to yields obtained in previous Indian studies like 1:2622 in AIIMS in 14 ,1:2972 in Jaipur 15 and 1:2000 in Andhra Pradesh. 10 Our yield was less compared to an yield of 1:686 in Apollo, New Delhi 16 , 1: 476 in another study in AIIMS 17 and 1:1125 in RML hospital in Delhi 18 and much higher compared to an yield of 1:4403 in Medanta, 19 , 1:5000 in Rotary TTK 20 1:17753 in Manipal Hospital. 21 Reasons for variability in yield is due to several factors like wide variation in the pattern of infections among donors, type of test employed, type of kit, sensitivity of the test and accuracy of methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…21 Reasons for variability in yield is due to several factors like wide variation in the pattern of infections among donors, type of test employed, type of kit, sensitivity of the test and accuracy of methods. 20 The performance of NAT assay is essentially dependent on analytical sensitivity. Our yield may be lower than some studies due to stringent donor screening criteria followed by us while the yield we obtained is higher than some previous studies may be due to greater sensitivity of the test method employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in such a situation, virus screening should necessarily involve detection of the viral load by molecular techniques such as RT-PCR and NAT. Transfusion safety is an approach aimed at ensuring the quality of the blood donation and protecting the recipient from any infectious intrusion [27,28,29,30,31]. Nowadays, the demand for blood donation is increasing every day in hospitals around the world, which goes without saying to improve the blood safety system, also taking into account the emergence of infectious diseases transmissible by transfusion [32,33,34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%