The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1990
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90150-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of atmospheric neutrino oscillations in the Fréjus experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the other atmospheric neutrino experiments, only Soudan II [27] sees an anomaly with a preliminary value of R = 0.69 ±0.19 ±0.09. The Frejus [28] results are marginally in conflict with the combined Kamiokande and IMB data. Considering the low statistics of Frejus experiment compared with the high statistical significance of Kamiokande and IMB data, we shall ignore this marginal discrepancy in our theoretical discussions.…”
Section: Solar Neutrino Puzzlementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Among the other atmospheric neutrino experiments, only Soudan II [27] sees an anomaly with a preliminary value of R = 0.69 ±0.19 ±0.09. The Frejus [28] results are marginally in conflict with the combined Kamiokande and IMB data. Considering the low statistics of Frejus experiment compared with the high statistical significance of Kamiokande and IMB data, we shall ignore this marginal discrepancy in our theoretical discussions.…”
Section: Solar Neutrino Puzzlementioning
confidence: 59%
“…In their atmospheric analysis, the Fréjus collaboration used the e/µ flavor ratio to divine their confidence limits in (sin 2 (2θ 23 ), ∆m 2 23 ) . They excluded the region sin 2 (2θ 23 ) > 0.6, ∆m 2 23 > 3.5 × 10 −3 eV 2 , and so while the Fréjus data did not suggest oscillation, it also did not exclude any of the Super-Kamiokande 99% confidence allowed region, save for a small slice at the very highest ∆m 2 23 values (see Figure 2.9) [22]. In a modern context, the Fréjus analysis is inconclusive.…”
Section: Fréjusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Frejus [33] 0.87 ± 0.16 ± 0.08 Table 2 collapse driven supernova, the inner core collapses subsonically, but the outer part of the core supersonically. At some point during the collapse, when the nuclear equation of state stiffens, the inner part of the core bounces, but the outer core continues falling in.…”
Section: Neutrino Flavor Mixing In Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%