1935
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(35)93550-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of an Ocular Infection Induced Experimentally with Bacterium Monocytogenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When cultures of L. monocytogenes are instilled into the conjunctival sac of rabbits, guinea pigs, or mice by means of a Pasteur pipette without scarifying the conjunctiva, a marked purulent conjunctivitis usually develops in 24 to 36 hr. This reaction was discovered independently and almost simultaneously by Anton (5) in Austria and Morris and Julianelle (161) in the United States. It is generally known as the "Anton reaction" even though Julianelle and Pons (118) were first to suggest this specific reaction as a rapid means of identifying suspect cultures.…”
Section: Characteristics Aiding Identification Ofmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When cultures of L. monocytogenes are instilled into the conjunctival sac of rabbits, guinea pigs, or mice by means of a Pasteur pipette without scarifying the conjunctiva, a marked purulent conjunctivitis usually develops in 24 to 36 hr. This reaction was discovered independently and almost simultaneously by Anton (5) in Austria and Morris and Julianelle (161) in the United States. It is generally known as the "Anton reaction" even though Julianelle and Pons (118) were first to suggest this specific reaction as a rapid means of identifying suspect cultures.…”
Section: Characteristics Aiding Identification Ofmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After the fifth postexposure day, the proportion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes increased until, by the tenth day, these cells predominated, giving the appearance of a purulent reaction. Congested capillaries, some of which showed proliferation of the endothelial lining, gave the appearance of pannus of the cornea (161). Occasionally there was hyperemia of the iris.…”
Section: Pathogenicity For Laboratory Animals Male or Nonpregnant Animentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably but consistent with observations from naturally infected animals, in some instances bacteria can be isolated from experimentally inoculated animals in the absence of clinical symptoms or pathological lesions, albeit bacterial concentrations are likely low since cultures had to be kept at refrigerated temperatures for several weeks to culture L. monocytogenes from the animal tissues, thereby hampering the growth of background microflora and allowing the psychotropic bacteria to reach numbers sufficient for detection [ 23 , 117 ]. Ocular inoculation produces conjunctivitis and other eye infections in non-pregnant animals of various species including rabbits, guinea pigs and non-human primates, and exposed animals occasionally develop septicemia, meningitis or meningoencephalitis [ 23 , 118 - 120 ]. Non-human primates mostly develop mild and transient ocular symptoms while guinea pigs and rabbits develop severe symptoms and occasionally succumb to systemic infection [ 120 ].…”
Section: Experimental Infections Before Recognition As Foodborne Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely associated with virulence is a diagnostic test which has been studied in this laboratory and which is considered valuable for purposes of identification, since all 24 strains studied induced a similar response. The reaction already reported upon (Morris and Julianelle, 1935;Julianelle and Pons, 1939a) is essentially an infection of the conjunctiva and cornea of rabbits, guinea-pigs, and mice, but apparently not of the monkey (M. rhesus). The test is best performed by the instillation of one or two drops of a young broth culture into the conjunctival sac in one eye, while in the other eye, inoculation is effected by gentle massage of the conjunctiva of the everted lid with a swab previously moistened in the same culture.…”
Section: Biological Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 85%