1951
DOI: 10.2307/3796607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Absorption and Retention of Lead in Wild Waterfowl in Relation to Clinical Evidence of Lead Poisoning

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the highest lead level detected on Islay was 22.5 mg/kg. This disparity may be explained by differences in feeding rates and retention times between species and individuals, with higher feeding rates and shorter retention times leading to lower faecal lead levels (Coburn et al 1951, Bellrose 1959, Figuerola et al 2005. Alternatively, these four Whitefronted Geese could have recently ingested or expelled lead shot from the gizzard resulting in lower faecal lead concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the highest lead level detected on Islay was 22.5 mg/kg. This disparity may be explained by differences in feeding rates and retention times between species and individuals, with higher feeding rates and shorter retention times leading to lower faecal lead levels (Coburn et al 1951, Bellrose 1959, Figuerola et al 2005. Alternatively, these four Whitefronted Geese could have recently ingested or expelled lead shot from the gizzard resulting in lower faecal lead concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental waterfowl that died after exposure to lead in various forms and routes contained 5-80/~g g-1 lead in their livers, with a usual range of 20-40/~g g-1 (Coburn et al, 1951;Cook and Trainer, 1966;Longcore et al, 1974). Lead levels were I>5/~g g-1 in livers of 8 of 18 (44%) wood ducks that were shot by hunters in the contaminated area in 1987 and1988 (John Nigh, personal communication) and in 4 of 13 (31%) wood ducks collected during this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were then used to interpret phosphorus concentration in tissues of redhead ducks (Aythya americana) collected from northern Chesapeake Bay, which led to the conclusion that "it appears probable" that the birds had been killed from ingestion of elemental phosphorus (Coburn et al 1950). In order to interpret quantities of lead that produce toxic signs in waterfowl, mallards were dosed with lead nitrate (soluble and readily absorbable form of lead) for several weeks (Coburn et al 1951). Anemia, emaciation, and a number of pathological lesions were consistently noted, and lead concentration in bone and liver was 7 and 40 times greater than that found in control birds.…”
Section: The Beginnings Of Wildlife Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%