2018
DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpy001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of a robust multi-objective supplier-material selection problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this validity study, the following issues are considered. The global criterion approach (see 53 ) is used to overcome the multi‐objectivity of the model. Some inputs of the model in this instance are as follows,Two suppliers are considered. Two potential plants, two potential DCs, and five customers are considered where one of them is dummy. Two types of transportation devices between suppliers and plants, two types of transportation devices between plants and DCs, and two types of transportation devices between plants/DCs and customers are considered. Three types of products, two types of raw materials, and two different technologies are considered. The instance is solved optimally in 10 seconds and the following objective function values are obtained,Objective function 1: 1,696,662.00, Objective function 2: 299,142.00, Objective function 3: 876.95. …”
Section: Problem Description and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this validity study, the following issues are considered. The global criterion approach (see 53 ) is used to overcome the multi‐objectivity of the model. Some inputs of the model in this instance are as follows,Two suppliers are considered. Two potential plants, two potential DCs, and five customers are considered where one of them is dummy. Two types of transportation devices between suppliers and plants, two types of transportation devices between plants and DCs, and two types of transportation devices between plants/DCs and customers are considered. Three types of products, two types of raw materials, and two different technologies are considered. The instance is solved optimally in 10 seconds and the following objective function values are obtained,Objective function 1: 1,696,662.00, Objective function 2: 299,142.00, Objective function 3: 876.95. …”
Section: Problem Description and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the results of the proposed meta‐heuristic approaches with exact solution methods, the global criterion approach (see Reference 53) is used to convert the multi‐objective problem in Section 2 to a single objective form. Then the test problems in Table 2 are solved by CPLEX solver of GAMS where 15,000 seconds CPU running time is allowed.…”
Section: Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, interpreting the membership functions and utilizing them for solving a problem is not an easy task [9]. Researchers have proposed several ways of providing an adequate solution to the problems that deal with the uncertain parameters [30]. One of the best methods for dealing with this category of problems is the "uncertainty theory" introduced by [31] and [32], which has attracted lots of attention recently [33]- [35].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the EDSSs are much more useful tools when they are uncertainty-proof (robust) by both incorporating the uncertainty of the parameters into the PROM and using an effective method to deal with them when offering a solution. To the best of author's knowledge, there is no evidence of a prior study on the application of the robust EDSS in the realm of FREM (Ghadiri Nejad et al, 2018;Golabi et al, 2017;Mosallaeipour, 2017;Niroomand et al, 2018;Shavarani et al, 2017;Mardani et al, 2015).…”
Section: Jcre 221mentioning
confidence: 99%