Whether patients who have started anti-viral therapy before or after therapy will have the same prognosis remains an unanswered question. Hepatic resection may cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and subsequent fulminant hepatitis, liver failure or death. 3 We agree that it is more appropriate to initiate anti-viral therapy before liver resection, as anti-viral therapy has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of HBV reactivation. 4 However, due to logistic reasons, not every patient is able to receive anti-viral therapy before resection. Our results showed that even patients treated after hepatectomy did better than those patients who were never on any anti-viral therapy (P < 0.001) and there was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival of patients who started anti-viral therapy before or after hepatectomy (P = 0.054). 2 Therefore, patients who have not been treated before surgery should still receive anti-viral therapy afterwards. We acknowledge the potential bias in all studies involving historical controls. However, in our study the prospective and retrospective cohorts had similar followup time and early and late recurrence rates. While evidence supporting the benefit of anti-viral therapy on post-hepatectomy survival is more consistent, further data is needed to show the impact of anti-viral therapy on late recurrence.