2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study into the distribution of gunshot residue particles in the random population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of 100 samples collected from individuals of varying occupations, only a single spherical PbBaSb particle was found on one individual. Lucas et al similarly observed characteristic PbBaSb particles in only 0.3% of samples collected randomly from volunteers in two Australian jurisdictions and PbSb particles in 8%. The probability of finding one or two 3‐component particles on clothing by chance may be as small as 0.02% .…”
Section: Transfermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Of 100 samples collected from individuals of varying occupations, only a single spherical PbBaSb particle was found on one individual. Lucas et al similarly observed characteristic PbBaSb particles in only 0.3% of samples collected randomly from volunteers in two Australian jurisdictions and PbSb particles in 8%. The probability of finding one or two 3‐component particles on clothing by chance may be as small as 0.02% .…”
Section: Transfermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using the Scopus search and the keyword results, the keyword "background" only appears once in the keyword list, in the review by Maitre et al [36]. There are a few more studies investigating the background frequency of GSR [39][40][41]. The keyword "frequency of occurrence" is also listed three times, once by Hannigan et al [42] and twice by Brozek-Mucha et al [43,44], whose studies involved surveying participants immediately after discharging a weapon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…explosive [33][34][35] and gunshot residues (GSR) [36][37][38][39][40][41], and soil [42][43][44][45][46], as well as other less commonly encountered traces including glitter [47], fragrances [48][49][50], lipsticks [51], petrol [52], and polyurethane foam [53]. While valuable, such research tends to be very material-dependent, introducing specific parameters and interpretations that may have actually impeded the recognition of underlying foundational factors that could apply to most material types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%