1928
DOI: 10.2307/2547800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study in Public Finance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But choosing to inflate deliberately, to reduce the debt-to-income ratio, involves a neglect of the future. This is what Pigou (1928), the early-twentieth-century British economist, referred to as a 'defective telescopic faculty'.…”
Section: Partmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But choosing to inflate deliberately, to reduce the debt-to-income ratio, involves a neglect of the future. This is what Pigou (1928), the early-twentieth-century British economist, referred to as a 'defective telescopic faculty'.…”
Section: Partmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gerber et al (2020) note that an ideal measure would capture the degree of progressivity of a tax system in one figure and also be unaffected by the (pre‐tax) income distribution. The most straightforward—and easily understood—measure of progressivity is that which originated in Pigou (1928), called the average rate progression (ARP). This is a ‘local’ measure of progressivity, calculated around two levels of income and is calculated simply as bold-italicpboldgoodbreak=()ETRnormalY2goodbreak−ETRY1Y2Y1.$$ \boldsymbol{p}=\frac{\left({ETR}_{{\mathrm{Y}}_2}-{ETR}_{Y_1}\right)}{\left({Y}_2-{Y}_1\right)}.…”
Section: The Progressivity Of Eitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, many other leading economists have made supporting statements - Blaug (2000) cites the examples of Paul Samuelson, Milton Friedman, James Tobin, James Buchanan, and Robert Solow. Ramsey (1927), who had been mentored by Pigou (see Pigou (1928)), published his rule for avoiding excess burdens in taxation, which is that taxes should be inversely proportional to elasticities, whether of supply or demand. This rule leads directly to capital as the worst tax base (Judd (1985), Chamley (1986)), because of its infinite long-run elasticity (this includes the possibility of capital flight in an open economy), and land as the best tax base, because of its zero long-run elasticity.…”
Section: Gaffneymentioning
confidence: 99%