2016 17th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icept.2016.7583088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study for a typical leakage failure of PCBA with no-cleaning process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore both SIR and ECM can be considered as overstress mechanisms, which give a short product lifetime. There is some literature on leak current or ECM investigation without considering the time and relation of them [18][19][20][21] however, in most cases, individual parameters are investigated rather than multi-parameter interactions [22][23][24][25]. Forasmuch as often there is no individual factor to create a failure, finding interactions of parameters and intensity impact of each interaction at least in two-way, and three-way interactions besides, the relation between leak current and time to ECM beginning are imperative for the right understanding of failure process and proper prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore both SIR and ECM can be considered as overstress mechanisms, which give a short product lifetime. There is some literature on leak current or ECM investigation without considering the time and relation of them [18][19][20][21] however, in most cases, individual parameters are investigated rather than multi-parameter interactions [22][23][24][25]. Forasmuch as often there is no individual factor to create a failure, finding interactions of parameters and intensity impact of each interaction at least in two-way, and three-way interactions besides, the relation between leak current and time to ECM beginning are imperative for the right understanding of failure process and proper prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%