2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structured methodology for assessing and improving e-services in digital cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, resource allocation, establishing appropriate educational standards, and any other learning opportunities and facilities with close ties with other universities, and proper technical support system throughout learning system and other key aspects of distance education must be considered if this system is to be evaluated effectively. Similar findings were reported by previous studies (17,23,25,27,34,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). In all learning theoretical foundations, the instructors were considered as major players, the role of whom in learning processes must be evaluated based on the relevant goals and objectives.…”
Section: Educational Approachessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, resource allocation, establishing appropriate educational standards, and any other learning opportunities and facilities with close ties with other universities, and proper technical support system throughout learning system and other key aspects of distance education must be considered if this system is to be evaluated effectively. Similar findings were reported by previous studies (17,23,25,27,34,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). In all learning theoretical foundations, the instructors were considered as major players, the role of whom in learning processes must be evaluated based on the relevant goals and objectives.…”
Section: Educational Approachessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Mais como realidades presentes que visões futurísticas e com trajetórias sedimentadas tanto na utilização de tecnologias de comunicação e informação quanto na constituição de sistemas de governança, já são consideráveis os quantitativos e as configurações sociotécnicas de cidades digitais intencional mente planejadas e executadas a partir das bases de políticas públicas (CONVERGENCIA RESEARCH 2009;FEDOROWICZ e DIAS 2010;CDG 2011;LOUKIS et al 2011;PAZALOS et al 2012; PEREIRA e PROCOPIUCK 2018). Apesar de tais avanços, persistem grandes desafios tanto para teóricos quanto para praticantes para desenvolver novas bases de planejamento para tornar cada vez mais concreta a ideia de cidade digital estratégica.…”
Section: Página | 251unclassified
“…Nessa linha, é notória a capacidade que as tecnologias da informação (TI) e as tecnologias de comunicação e informação (TICs) têm para influenciar a dinâmica socioeconômica urbana (BOLAY e KERN 2011) e, consequentemente, os debates sobre cidades digitais (ISHIDA 2000;SHIN 2005;PROCOPIUCK e FREY 2009;LOUKIS et al 2011). Esses debates se intensificam na medida em que as TICs ganham força como instrumentalização de atividades políticas, econômicas e sociais locais (BAILEY e NGWENYAMA 2011;REZENDE et al 2015; PEREIRA e PROCOPIUCK 2018) para impulsionar do desenvolvimento local (PFEIFER 2007;PAZALOS et al 2012) e, ao mesmo tempo, ampliar a influência das cidades em âmbito global (FREY et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…2009). Pazalos (2012) has presented a structured method for the evaluation and correction of electronic cities (Pazalos, K, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%