2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structure-Based Platform for Predicting Chemical Reactivity

Abstract: Although machine learning has a long-standing history in chemical research with respect to the prediction of molecular properties and biological activities, the quantitative modeling of reactivity has only been approached recently, and current models suggest that complex and specific parameterization is inevitable. As opposed to this, we report a simple machine learning model for predicting various reaction outcomes, such as yields and stereoselectivities. Being based on a solely structural input, our model sh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
228
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
228
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate prediction of chemical reactions is an important goal both in academic and industrial research. [1][2][3] Recently, machine learning approaches have had tremendous success in quantitative prediction of reaction yields based on data from high-throughput experimentation 4,5 and enantioselectivities based on carefully selected universal training sets. 6 At the same time, traditional quantitative structure-reactivity relationship (QSRR) methods based on linear regression have seen a renaissance with interpretable, holistic models that can generalize across reaction types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate prediction of chemical reactions is an important goal both in academic and industrial research. [1][2][3] Recently, machine learning approaches have had tremendous success in quantitative prediction of reaction yields based on data from high-throughput experimentation 4,5 and enantioselectivities based on carefully selected universal training sets. 6 At the same time, traditional quantitative structure-reactivity relationship (QSRR) methods based on linear regression have seen a renaissance with interpretable, holistic models that can generalize across reaction types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain preliminary insights into the predictive powers of these ML models in conjunction with various molecular fingerprints, we first compared their mean absolute errors (MAE) for predicted absorption and emission wavelengths Morgan fingerprints show better performance, which implies that the representation of molecular structures by atom neighborhoods might be better for our purpose. In the recent study by Glorious et al 67 , the benefits of combining multiple fingerprints features (MFFs) as a composite input molecular descriptor was demonstrated. However, due to the extreme lengths of MFFs (more than 70,000 bits), the resultant increase of computation cost limits its application.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erstere ist, wie die Entwicklung neuer Darstellungen (z. B. Mol2Vec, multimolekulare Fingerabdrücke, Graph‐basierte Modelle) immer wieder zeigt, für ein erfolgreiches ML unerlässlich und kann die Ursache für Misserfolg, Erfolg oder Fehlinterpretation eines Modells sein, während Letztere die endgültige Leistungsfähigkeit und die Lerngeschwindigkeit des Modells stark beeinflusst. Auch wenn dies adäquates Wissen aus vielen Bereichen erfordert, müssen wir damit beginnen, (selbst‐)kritisch über gewählte Methoden und fehlende Anpassung zu diskutieren, und sollten offen auf Mängel hinweisen, um die Verbreitung falscher oder schlechter Modelle zu vermeiden.…”
Section: Generelle Herausforderungenunclassified