2015
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structuration framework for bridging the macro–micro divide in health‐care governance

Abstract: Background Extant studies demonstrate that macro (hierarchical) and micro (relational) governance initiatives in health-care settings continue to be developed in isolation rather than interactively. Government-driven hierarchical governance endeavours that guide health-care reforms and medical practice are disconnected from micro-level physician-patient interactions being unable to account for patient preferences in the macro-level policymaking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a number of studies have been conducted using Stones' strong structuration theory using case studies and mixed methods [43]. There has been work on accounting research [45,78], the adoption of IT in health care [42], health care governance [79], and carbon accounting and policy development [54]. Similar to these, the recreation SECAS meta-framework could be applied at various focal levels (manager level as the agent in focus) to address the process of integration of recreation management with the management of other resources at the forest level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of studies have been conducted using Stones' strong structuration theory using case studies and mixed methods [43]. There has been work on accounting research [45,78], the adoption of IT in health care [42], health care governance [79], and carbon accounting and policy development [54]. Similar to these, the recreation SECAS meta-framework could be applied at various focal levels (manager level as the agent in focus) to address the process of integration of recreation management with the management of other resources at the forest level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As others have shown, initiatives in the healthcare setting continue to be developed in isolation rather than interactively at micro- and macro-levels. This is an inefficient and expensive undertaking that rarely translates into higher quality of care [55]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publications about ST span the literature of many disciplines relevant to UNC. Moreover, ST has been used successfully to guide metatheorizing activities to address the structure-agency perspective in sociotechnical systems (including health care) and to bridge humanist and structuralists perspectives about health outcomes (Bodilica, Spraggon, & Tofan, 2015;Bostrom, Gupta, & Thomas, 2009;Groves, Meisenbach, & Scott-Cawiezell, 2011;Hardcastle, Usher, & Holmes, 2005;Jones & Karsten, 2008;Oppong, 2014).…”
Section: Metatheory As a Cross-disciplinary Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ST represents a synthesis of two seemingly discordant views of social phenomena: determinism and voluntarism (Baber, 1991;Bodilica et al, 2015;Jones & Karsten, 2008;Lee, 1990). In the extreme determinist view (also known as structural functionalism), human activity is a function of macro-level social structures (i.e.…”
Section: Structuration Theory As a Metatheoretical Guidementioning
confidence: 99%