1982
DOI: 10.1016/0141-8130(82)90053-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural model for the chromophore-binding domain of ovine rhodopsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…#16 refers to $ calculated over a 16 residue length of sequence which shows the most amphipathicity. Values of & and $16 which are greater than 2 reflect a high probability of an amphipathic helix over the length of the sequence used the retinal binding domain [2,3,7]. The equivalent position to the retinal binding lysine of bovine opsin in our alignment is the Y-407 in the human Ml subtype of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…#16 refers to $ calculated over a 16 residue length of sequence which shows the most amphipathicity. Values of & and $16 which are greater than 2 reflect a high probability of an amphipathic helix over the length of the sequence used the retinal binding domain [2,3,7]. The equivalent position to the retinal binding lysine of bovine opsin in our alignment is the Y-407 in the human Ml subtype of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence (Lee et al, 1991) was made using the Leeds package of algorithms (Eliopoulos et al, 1982). Regions of sequence identity and homology were identified by comparisons of the amino acid sequence of L. mesenteroides G6PD with those of G6PDs from human (Persico et al, 1986), rat (Ho et al, 1988), Drosophila (Fouts et al, 1988), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Nogae & Johnston, 1990;Thomas et al, 1991), E. coli (Rowley & Wolf, 1991), and Zymomonas mobilis (Barnell et al, 1990), using a multiple sequence alignment and prediction protocol (Russell et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary structure predictions using the joint prediction algorithm [25], together with hydrophobic moment analysis and surface profile prediction (from residue hydrophilicity, flexibility and accessibility parameters), enabled us roughly to define the eight putative P-strands (A -H) of crustacyanin A2 forming the P-barrel: A (31-39), B (42-49), C (58-67), D (72-81), E(84-94), F (97-108), G (112-122) and H (128-135). In the sequence alignment with RBP several of the residues in contact with retinol [I21 were found to be conserved in crustacyanin A2.…”
Section: Consensus Imentioning
confidence: 99%