2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural model for perceptual learning styles, the ideal L2 self, motivated behavior, and English proficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
52
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of achievement have been reported to be different across learners' different levels (Yang & Kim 2011). Kim and Kim (2014) studied the structural relationship between perceptual styles, English learning motivation, and achievement and found that kinesthetic styles were negatively correlated with the respective variables while visual and auditory styles were positively correlated. The studies reviewed show that perceptual learning styles play a crucial role in EFL learners' success.…”
Section: Lexical Inferencing Perceptual Styles and Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of achievement have been reported to be different across learners' different levels (Yang & Kim 2011). Kim and Kim (2014) studied the structural relationship between perceptual styles, English learning motivation, and achievement and found that kinesthetic styles were negatively correlated with the respective variables while visual and auditory styles were positively correlated. The studies reviewed show that perceptual learning styles play a crucial role in EFL learners' success.…”
Section: Lexical Inferencing Perceptual Styles and Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with self-discrepancy theory, D€ ornyei argues that it motivates engagement in L2 learning insofar as "if the person we would like to become speaks an L2 [ …], the ideal L2 self is a powerful motivator to learn the L2 because we would like to reduce the discrepancy between our actual and ideal selves" (in D€ ornyei & Chan, 2013:438). Indeed, the empirical validity of the ideal L2 self and its links with motivated L2 learning behaviour have been evidenced by a substantial body of research, including larger correlational studies (e.g., Al-Shehri, 2009;Csiz er & Kormos, 2009;D€ ornyei & Chan, 2013;Kim and Kim, 2014;Kormos, Kiddle, & Csiz er, 2011;Papi, 2010;Ryan, 2009;Taguchi, Magid, & Papi, 2009), qualitative work (e.g., Hsieh, 2009;Lamb, 2011) and an increasing number of mixed method inquiries (e.g., Busse, 2013;Sampson, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal L2 self substantially predicts motivated behavior (e.g., Csizér & Lukács, 2010;T. Kim & Y. Kim, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Dörnyei & Chan, 2013, p. 439) The L2 Motivation Self System has been the basis of several studies in Iran, China, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and Pakistan. Some of the studies aimed to validate the L2 Motivational Self System (e.g., T. Kim & Y. Kim, 2014;Magid, 2014;Papi, 2012;Taguchi et al, 2009;Ueki & Takeuchi, 2013). Other studies examined the role of the ideal L2 self in predicting motivated behavior and English learning achievement, and identified its relationship with learning anxiety, gender, and L3 self (e.g., Csizér & Lukács, 2010;Henry, 2009;Papi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%