2003
DOI: 10.1785/0120030146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structural Interpretation of the Aftershock "Cloud" of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers Earthquake

Abstract: We analyze the spatial relationship of relocated aftershocks to the principal rupture planes of the M w 7.3 1992 Landers mainshock from a structural point of view. We find that the aftershocks constitute primarily a several-kilometer-wide damage zone centered on the mainshock rupture planes. The intensity of damage decreases away from the principal faults. Less than half of the aftershocks occurred within 1 km of the mainshock planes, and perhaps only 5% of the aftershocks are candidates for rerupture of the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barka et al (2002) also measured a~5 m surface displacement following the 1999 İzmit earthquake. Therefore relatively high b-values for the stepover area east of the junction should be expected due to structural heterogeneity (King, 1986;Liu et al, 2003;Wiemer and Katsumata, 1999). The aftershock studies (Aktar et al, 2004;Karabulut et al, 2002;Özalaybey et al, 2002) indicate a cluster of earthquakes in the fault junction, emphasizing a stress accumulation following the İzmit earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barka et al (2002) also measured a~5 m surface displacement following the 1999 İzmit earthquake. Therefore relatively high b-values for the stepover area east of the junction should be expected due to structural heterogeneity (King, 1986;Liu et al, 2003;Wiemer and Katsumata, 1999). The aftershock studies (Aktar et al, 2004;Karabulut et al, 2002;Özalaybey et al, 2002) indicate a cluster of earthquakes in the fault junction, emphasizing a stress accumulation following the İzmit earthquake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapped surface traces and distributed off‐fault deformation indicate that structural complexity is enhanced close to the hypocenter (Liu et al, ; Milliner et al, ). The rapid rupture initiation could potentially be delayed by considering fault structures more complex than the curved, yet purely strike‐slip fault geometry used in our simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such damage zones may result from distributed inelastic deformation associated with the propagation and coalescence of cracks and joints during fault growth (Segall & Pollard 1980;Vermilye & Scholz 1998;Manighetti et al 2001), relaxation of stresses at geometric irregularities (Liu et al 2003;Dieterich & Smith 2007) or dynamic loading at the propagating rupture front (Rice et al 2005;Fialko 2007). Field observations suggest that the thickness of the cataclasite zones correlates with the cumulative fault slip (Scholz 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%