2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77249-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Canonical Correlation Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, current software implementations do not produce standard errors of the weight estimates. To address this issues, it was proposed to apply the delta method (Dorfman, 1938;Gu et al, 2019;Lu & Gu, 2018).…”
Section: Estimating Structural Models Containing Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, current software implementations do not produce standard errors of the weight estimates. To address this issues, it was proposed to apply the delta method (Dorfman, 1938;Gu et al, 2019;Lu & Gu, 2018).…”
Section: Estimating Structural Models Containing Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the H-O specification, the weight estimates were calculated based on Equation 4; that is, they were obtained from the estimated loadings. Although, the standard errors for the weight estimates can be generally obtained via the delta method (Gu et al, 2019;Lu & Gu, 2018), they are not reported in the following. The IGSCA results were copied from the original study of Hwang et al (2021; see Tables 6 and 7 of their study).…”
Section: K ¼mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the standard errors of the weights can be obtained using the delta method ([34], Chapter 2). Since the weights are functions of the composite loadings, their standard errors can generally be obtained as follows (see also [36]):…”
Section: The Refined H-o Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the standard errors of the weights can be obtained using the delta method ([34], Chapter 2). Since the weights are functions of the composite loadings, their standard errors can generally be obtained as follows (see also [36]): normalvar(w)goodbreak=normalvar(boldf(λ))goodbreak=boldf(λ)boldλnormalvar(λ)boldf(λ)boldλ,$$ \operatorname{var}\left(\mathbf{w}\right)=\operatorname{var}\left(\mathbf{f}\left(\boldsymbol{\uplambda} \right)\right)=\frac{\partial \mathbf{f}\left(\boldsymbol{\uplambda} \right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\uplambda}}\operatorname{var}\left(\boldsymbol{\uplambda} \right){\left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{f}\left(\boldsymbol{\uplambda} \right)}{\partial \boldsymbol{\uplambda}}\right)}^{\prime }, $$ where w = vec( W ), λ = vec( Λ ), and f ( λ ) are the functions producing the vectorized inverse of Λ , that is, the weights, and ∂ f ( λ )/∂ λ is the Jacobian matrix of f . Note that standard errors of the weight estimates are not produced by default in SEM software because only composite loadings are specified and their standard errors are thereby reported.…”
Section: The Refined H–o Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%