2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly speaking, SDA breaks down observed changes in a physical variable (e.g., water use) over time, into the changes in its key determinants, which can act as accelerators or retardants. SDA has become a widely accepted analytical tool to evaluate the drivers of change for a number of environmental indicators: for instance greenhouse gas emissions (Arto & Dietzenbacher, ; Malik & Lan, ), energy footprint (Lan et al, ), and nitrogen water pollution (Wan et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly speaking, SDA breaks down observed changes in a physical variable (e.g., water use) over time, into the changes in its key determinants, which can act as accelerators or retardants. SDA has become a widely accepted analytical tool to evaluate the drivers of change for a number of environmental indicators: for instance greenhouse gas emissions (Arto & Dietzenbacher, ; Malik & Lan, ), energy footprint (Lan et al, ), and nitrogen water pollution (Wan et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been conducted on consumption-based emissions (e.g. CO 2 emissions , Lan et al 2016, rare metal consumption (Nansai et Shigetomi et al 2015) and nitrogen circulation (Oita et al 2016)). Koh et al (2016) analysed the consumption-based emission amount of chemical substances, although they did not clearly consider the toxicity of the chemical substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the technology effect is negligible, because an initial reduction in Brazil's energy intensity reverted into an increase after 1980, driven by increasing demand for energy-intensive products by Brazil's developing middle class. Further atypical energy SDA examples are Russia and Japan in the analysis by Lan et al (2016), where the economic collapse of the post-Soviet states and Japan's Heisei recession are clearly discernible in the final demand-level effect. Lan et al (2016) completed the first comprehensive energy SDA of the entire world, distinguishing more than 180 countries, and separating domestic and trade effects.…”
Section: Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further atypical energy SDA examples are Russia and Japan in the analysis by Lan et al (2016), where the economic collapse of the post-Soviet states and Japan's Heisei recession are clearly discernible in the final demand-level effect. Lan et al (2016) completed the first comprehensive energy SDA of the entire world, distinguishing more than 180 countries, and separating domestic and trade effects. They present a typology of SDA results, characterising a range from resource-rich developing countries with strongly growing domestic energy footprints and negligible rest-ofworld footprints, to resource-poor developed countries with domestic energy footprints decreasing at the cost of growing energy embodiments in imports.…”
Section: Energymentioning
confidence: 99%