2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strongly S-stable low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta scheme for convection diffusion systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when a fixed step-size is used, strongly S -stable methods are more accurate than the other methods. Several numerical tests showed that only S -stable methods can produce accurate simulations by using significantly large step-size for stiff problems [73]. Finally, RADAU5 is capable of arranging the step-size along with the desired error—controlled by means of ε a and ε r tolerances, which are user-defined parameter—and the detected level of stiffness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when a fixed step-size is used, strongly S -stable methods are more accurate than the other methods. Several numerical tests showed that only S -stable methods can produce accurate simulations by using significantly large step-size for stiff problems [73]. Finally, RADAU5 is capable of arranging the step-size along with the desired error—controlled by means of ε a and ε r tolerances, which are user-defined parameter—and the detected level of stiffness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when a fixed step-size is used, strongly S -stable methods are more accurate than the other methods. Several numerical tests showed that only S -stable methods can produce accurate simulations by using significantly large step-size for stiff problems [ 73 ]. Finally, RADAU5 is capable of arranging the step-size along with the desired error—controlled by means of ε a and ε r tolerances, which are user-defined parameters—and the detected level of stiffness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%