1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(97)00051-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stress integration algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity and its applications to explicit finite element analysis of sheet metal forming processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7-9 show the calculated iso-error maps for anisotropic material formulations under the associated or non-associated flow rule. For the formulations based on the associated flow rule, the magnitudes of errors are comparable to the results reported in literature (Yoon et al, 1999;Lee et al, 1998). For the isotropic formulation, the exact solutions are obtained for the loading directed along the yield surface symmetry axis, as shown for points B and C at Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Accuracy Iso-error Mapssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…7-9 show the calculated iso-error maps for anisotropic material formulations under the associated or non-associated flow rule. For the formulations based on the associated flow rule, the magnitudes of errors are comparable to the results reported in literature (Yoon et al, 1999;Lee et al, 1998). For the isotropic formulation, the exact solutions are obtained for the loading directed along the yield surface symmetry axis, as shown for points B and C at Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Accuracy Iso-error Mapssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using the GCPP algorithm, a trial stress point is relaxed to the real closest stress point of the yield surface in the principal stress plane, which allows more treatment in stress integration. The detailed formulation and iso-error maps of the GCPP algorithm is shown in [2].…”
Section: Stress Integration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-7 show the error of the numerical procedure for the three different load cases named A, B and C. As can be observed in all three cases the error is not larger than 3%. For example, in [8] largest error is up to 20%, in [1] it is between 1.4% and 3.5% or in [2] between 5% and 20%. However, it should be mentioned that while the first paper is isotropic in nature, the two others consider anisotropy within the small strain regime only.…”
Section: Isoerror Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%