Abstract:Abstroct-Magnetostrictivematerials a r e known to have hysteresis with respect to both magnetic field H and mechanical stress 6. Also, the order in which H and (T are applied is sometimes significant. This paper proposes one generalization of the classical Preisach model in which these properties are handled by treating a combination of H and 6 as an effective field H e (H ,o). The classical Preisach model can thus be generalized to M ( t ) = II p(a,p) rap H, (~( t ) , o ( t ) , a ,~) d a d~ -H , S f k a l H ,… Show more
“…Even so, the TPM still provides much better accuracy than the CPM under conditions of a high-speed excitation voltage and a dynamic load. Several coupling hysteresis models, based on the Preisach model [21][22][23][24] and PI model [26], have the same limitations as the TPM. So the alternative to the TPM would be a dynamic model [25], assuming that it is feasible to describe the piezoelectric coupling hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various mathematical models to describe coupling hysteresis behavior in magnetostrictive actuators for varying mechanical loads have been devised [6,[21][22][23][24][25][26], and general forms of coupling hysteresis models based on the CPM are given in [6,21]. Suzuki [22] developed a stress-dependent model based on the moving Preisach model [6], while Davino [23] presented a stress-dependent magnetostriction phenomenological model by employing the CPM and a memory less bivariate function.…”
“…Even so, the TPM still provides much better accuracy than the CPM under conditions of a high-speed excitation voltage and a dynamic load. Several coupling hysteresis models, based on the Preisach model [21][22][23][24] and PI model [26], have the same limitations as the TPM. So the alternative to the TPM would be a dynamic model [25], assuming that it is feasible to describe the piezoelectric coupling hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various mathematical models to describe coupling hysteresis behavior in magnetostrictive actuators for varying mechanical loads have been devised [6,[21][22][23][24][25][26], and general forms of coupling hysteresis models based on the CPM are given in [6,21]. Suzuki [22] developed a stress-dependent model based on the moving Preisach model [6], while Davino [23] presented a stress-dependent magnetostriction phenomenological model by employing the CPM and a memory less bivariate function.…”
“…Constitutive modeling literature will be discussed first, then experimental literature. Bergqvist and Engdahl (1991) extended the classical Preisach model to include the stress dependence of the magnetic field. This paper essentially tries to model the field and stress hysteresis curves for magnetostrictive materials.…”
“…To this aim, we refer to the class of operators based on the Preisach deletion rule, stated in eqn. (5). We refer to this operators, to as P 0 -operators.…”
Section: For Every Input Function X(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents a hysteresis operator with two inputs which generalizes the definition in [5] to a wider class of hysteresis operators. Before proceeding in the description of multi-variate systems with hysteresis in control applications, it is mandatory to provide some information concerning its identification.…”
Section: Multi-variate Systems With Hysteresismentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.