1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1251-8050(99)80117-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stratigraphical framework for Miocene (MN4-MN13) continental sediments of Central Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, we performed a ML AEa analysis considering together the fossil sites from the two provinces. Nevertheless, following considerations of the presence of two very differentiated biogeographical provinces in our study area (Nvarez Sierra et aI., 1990;Alberdi and Azanza, 1997;Daams et al" 1998;Morales et al, 1999), we also developed an independent ML AEa analysis for each province, which allow us to avoid biogeographic effects on our analysis. In order to establish whether this approach provides a better arrangement of the fossil sites than the one based on the whole Iberoccitanian region we finally took into account the ML AEa analyses with the highest Cl values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, we performed a ML AEa analysis considering together the fossil sites from the two provinces. Nevertheless, following considerations of the presence of two very differentiated biogeographical provinces in our study area (Nvarez Sierra et aI., 1990;Alberdi and Azanza, 1997;Daams et al" 1998;Morales et al, 1999), we also developed an independent ML AEa analysis for each province, which allow us to avoid biogeographic effects on our analysis. In order to establish whether this approach provides a better arrangement of the fossil sites than the one based on the whole Iberoccitanian region we finally took into account the ML AEa analyses with the highest Cl values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,6 Ma., y el límite superior del Rambliense y, por tanto, base del Aragoniense (límite entre las zonas A/B) entre 16,8 y 17 Ma. Esta última datación corrobora la edad estimada para dicho límite en unos 17 Ma en la cuenca de Calatayud-Teruel por Daams et al (1998Daams et al ( y 1999a. Asimismo, Aguilar et al (1996) obtienen una datación radiométrica de 17,5 ± 3 Ma para el yacimiento francés de Beaulieu, cuya fauna consideran que es anterior a la entrada de Democricetodon, por lo que el límite entre las zonas MN 3/MN 4 sería algo más reciente a dicha edad, por tanto similar a los datos obtenidos en España tal como puntualizan Daams et al (1998).…”
Section: Ramblienseunclassified
“…-Calatayud-Teruel: Cuenca de CalatayudDaroca: Ateca 3 Bruijn y Meurs, 1967;Daams, 1981;López Martínez 1989); La Dehesa, Bañón 5, 2, 11A, Moratilla y Agreda (datado en unos 18 Ma por Daams et al, 1998) (Daams y Meulen, 1984;López, 1984;Daams y Freudenthal, 1988a); San Roque 4 A y B (Daams et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Yacimientosunclassified
“…El límite inferior del Vallesiense está alrededor de los 11 Ma (Krijgsman et al, 1996;Agustí et al, 1997;Daams et al, 1998), y la duración de este piso se estima hasta los 8,7 Ma (Krijgsman et al, 1996;Daams et al, 1998;Agustí et al, 2001;van Dam et al, 2001).…”
Section: El Neógeno Españolunclassified