2017
DOI: 10.1111/jpg.12692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stratigraphic Review of the Late Callovian to Oxfordian Interval, Fisher Bank Basin Area (Uk Sector, Central North Sea)

Abstract: * The Middle to Upper Jurassic succession of six wells in the Fisher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper Eocene to lower Oligocene lithostratigraphy outlined above has been interpreted within two distinct sequence stratigraphic models. The first argues that the Yazoo-Bumpnose contact coincides with a maximum flooding surface throughout the region (Baum and Vail, 1988;Echols et al, 2003;Jaramillo and Oboh-Ikuenobe, 1999;Loutit et al, 1988;Mancini and Tew, 1991;Tew, 1992). The second, and more recent (Miller et al, 2008), supports the association of the Yazoo-Bumpnose contact (Dockery, 1982) with a low stand sequence boundary, which is linked to the increasing δ 18 O (Zachos et al, 2001(Zachos et al, , 1996(Zachos et al, , 2008 and global eustatic sea level fall (Coxall et al, 2005;Pekar et al, 2002) during the EOT.…”
Section: Regional Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The upper Eocene to lower Oligocene lithostratigraphy outlined above has been interpreted within two distinct sequence stratigraphic models. The first argues that the Yazoo-Bumpnose contact coincides with a maximum flooding surface throughout the region (Baum and Vail, 1988;Echols et al, 2003;Jaramillo and Oboh-Ikuenobe, 1999;Loutit et al, 1988;Mancini and Tew, 1991;Tew, 1992). The second, and more recent (Miller et al, 2008), supports the association of the Yazoo-Bumpnose contact (Dockery, 1982) with a low stand sequence boundary, which is linked to the increasing δ 18 O (Zachos et al, 2001(Zachos et al, , 1996(Zachos et al, , 2008 and global eustatic sea level fall (Coxall et al, 2005;Pekar et al, 2002) during the EOT.…”
Section: Regional Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full species list is provided in Appendix 1. The rich and well-preserved dinocyst assemblages provide the basis for a detailed assessment of upper Eocene dinoflagellate biostratigraphy in this succession, which is developed with reference to dinocyst biostratigraphic data from offshore eastern Canada (Egger et al, 2016;Williams, 1975Williams, , 1977, the Gulf Coast Plain (Houben et al, 2018;Jaramillo and Oboh-Ikuenobe, 1999), offshore Florida (VanMourik et al, 2001), the Norwegian and Greenland seas (Eldrett et al, 2004;Manum, 1976;Manum et al, 1989;Williams and Manum, 1999), the North Sea Gradstein et al, 1992;Hansen, 1977;Heilmann-Clausen and Van Simaeys, 2005;Mudge and Bujak, 1996;Śliwińska et al, 2012), the Hampshire Basin (Costa et al, 1976), the central Mediterranean region (Brinkhuis, 1994;Brinkhuis and Biffi, 1993;Van Mourik and Brinkhuis, 2005;Wilpshaar et al, 1996), northwestern Europe (England, Belgium, and Germany; Costa and Downie, 1979;Kothe, 1990), the Tasmanian Gateway (Stickley et al, 2004), and the wider Northern Hemisphere (Williams, 1993). Although there have been studies of dinocyst biohorizons across the EOB interval in Gulf Coast sections from Alabama (e.g.…”
Section: Dinocyst Biostratigraphic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation